From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8622: 24.0.50; url-parse does not implement RFC3986 5.2 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:47:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87pqj73u1l.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87y5xv5ls1.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87litv5eiv.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87ehzn5ccp.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <877h5f5b3y.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <8739g35a2w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87y5xv3v0k.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <87ty8j3ufr.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315759675 30408 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2011 16:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , 8622@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 18:47:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nCA-0001BO-Q8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:47:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33579 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nCA-0007Mx-F5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nC7-0007Mh-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nC6-000317-9l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:47:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nC6-000313-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nGE-0000I7-E2; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Julien Danjou Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8622 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8622-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8622.13157599151106 (code B ref 8622); Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8622) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2011 16:51:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nG6-0000Hm-KL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:51:55 -0400 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2nG5-0000He-6H for 8622@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (AMontsouris-651-1-27-169.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.123.86.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C3655C1A0; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:47:35 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:37:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:52:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50920 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 11 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Julien Danjou writes: > >> I'm sorry, I am missing why this does not apply to the example I gave. > > http://a/../../b is not a relative URL. :-) > > The entire thing is about how to glue a base URL, like "http://a/b/c" > together with a relative URL, like "../../d". If you're not gluing URLs > together, then the section does not apply. At all. Oh ok. But if you consider the base URL being http://a/, you clearly match this case. I admit we are not doing relative anyhow, but I don't think absolute and relative are supposed to have different behaviour in such a case. And it seems that 5.2.4 clearly explains the algo in our (absolute) case, don't you think? =2D-=20 Julien Danjou =E2=9D=B1 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJObOYmAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCCCkP/1o4+IL3uQVs5p/doKKkUv9v Z97PvT7OrgsY/n/y0fV4WoZT58NxSCMtvNuNRsJ/XwoKkJO9mEW30TzhbXyML8Sg eGN+M6a4fm4Mfsm5eGdwoFdkKvTvbDSopqXjnSIcKNohh1Em4WQBYNqp1M8Yg4pU 8NW/kE3sDMUJTPZQI8xo8YzHSPxa0LVxaodpmi4Fl0HvWDUhYRvltUt2LY3WXks7 rRCI5AfBn7Yj6/h+HNf+4dwJXx++qgEHQ7Gv0mG+IiBowS+QufKuhTlCQnpRgOow OEhuY7J+IuUNtUQExnF0s3oqakkQLXj8LVm2BY1zkx5/psjuqDQD8IunSkbZxl32 w88ERsyrjDR1dMscbjlsMgpBEWxRhFl0S44nTFdOb5Q8lb7qH0dI4GNNOMfh/5OB zsuXs0eJeSaabGpFRENhuei83ha2X+kgk4Emp4X2mKJXfGndTbpLj6Fc/nGHeujt Spt+xKRd7OT1yxRZxJb8fzsInnxZB44iMwPNXUs55c+sDz7mruJNTky5V1KF9GDF +hGsE/DClj78WuLs2qVHDaQlXvyFDdyzoqRy6vFdlZ8WAJyiqI7U7txm/Q0UfNhB eK60D60tB8fbndk3dRqPhc7UV9FdD46hXdf6PuJm5+7j65vuN/ec11t6rIj3MV3h Sb8VACEc7BJ9Lx7NStf1 =Xidx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--