From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:08:15 +0900 Message-ID: <87pqhpf1qo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <83fwix2osa.fsf@gnu.org> <0B3EE7A4-D0D6-4D1E-ADC4-0BEE68F179B2@mit.edu> <87fwivwp37.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmvpmd2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa93wmc4.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmnrdjw.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87ty73mc0m.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <4EA19111.7060401@yandex.ru> <87vcrhfmww.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319299715 14539 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2011 16:08:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 22 18:08:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RHe7Y-0000HK-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:08:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHe7X-0002H2-SB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHe7V-0002Gm-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHe7U-0001Tp-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:56471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHe7T-0001TE-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422DE3FA0750; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:08:15 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 391A01A2888; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:08:15 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0a1 under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" 76fad4a87f68 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.223 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145420 Archived-At: Carsten Mattner writes: > Is the gnutls memory usage a leak, or just some allocated arrays for > crypto arrays? Just a wild guess, nothing scientific to back it up. It sounds like a leak to me, since the reports we're seeing are of memory creeping up over time. I would expect any arrays to be on the order of a few MB, not 100s.