From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: changes to cfengine-mode (was: prog-mode not available in earlier Emacsen, need help with cfengine.el) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:12:14 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqg7x89t.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> References: <87ipmcgjot.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83lir89gne.fsf@gnu.org> <87aa7ogfo3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwhffv37.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h2ridev.fsf@gnu.org> <8739dfezc1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa7m5a6b.fsf@gnu.org> <877h2oe3yj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h2ngnhb.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <87hb1qb9ot.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqg82tdy.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322842367 22289 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2011 16:12:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:12:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 17:12:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWVjA-0002VT-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:12:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWVj9-00014X-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:12:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWVj3-00014R-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:12:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWVix-00032y-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:12:37 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RWVix-00032b-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:12:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RWViu-0002L8-U8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:12:28 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:12:28 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:12:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FfMu4Ls4QSnCoRku3+Maj/2jXew= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146431 Archived-At: I'd like to rename `cfengine-mode' to `cfengine2-mode', and `cfengine-auto-mode' to `cfengine-mode' (`cfengine-auto-mode' loads `cfengine3-mode' if it thinks a cfengine v.3 file is edited). The effect on users of CFengine v.2 will be nil, since the detection is very cautious and assumes v.2. Users of v.3 will get `cfengine3-mode'. Another approach is to rename `cfengine-mode' to `cfengine2-mode' and `cfengine3-mode' to `cfengine-mode', effectively making v.2 support less important. **I like this approach better** because cfengine v.2 is disappearing quickly, but it would break backwards compatibility so I proposed it second. Let me know what you think. Thanks! Ted