From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:37:56 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqevr5u3.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <3FB40138-C766-4A45-8E5A-4E404449995E@gmail.com> <546D7C22-520D-46A9-8AA1-9D33CF2F6782@gmail.com> <87obuhpqrl.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k455pncx.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87fwftpjqi.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87zke02qg1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325943626 15478 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2012 13:40:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 14:40:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVM-0007IF-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:40:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57768 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVM-00019K-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVJ-000194-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVH-00073B-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:40:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVH-00072y-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 08:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjWVF-0007Eq-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:40:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SWkyV1vgieeXR/SrI1pdRIlnE1E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147444 Archived-At: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:30:27 +0100 Juanma Barranquero wrote: JB> Right. I don't reject adding such a system, with a note in NEWS JB> saying: "if you want automatic warning of updates, customize the JB> variable `emacs-check-for-updates'"- However, I do fear that, once the JB> system is in place, for 24.2 or 25.1 we will heard people say that the JB> default should be t. I think the final decision should be up to the Emacs maintainers. So far Stefan and Chong have said there is no chance of enabling automatic update checks by default, so I think you can stop worrying. Ted