From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: AUCTeX Mode Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:10:22 +0800 Message-ID: <87pqdztfj5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F22604C.8090507@alice.it> <4F2518D5.1090208@alice.it> <4F28748A.1050103@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328065844 26214 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 03:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen?= Fenn , emacs To: Angelo Graziosi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 04:10:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQaj-0004VD-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:10:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQai-0001hw-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQaf-0001hd-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQae-00070H-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQae-00070D-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:32 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:37009 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsQad-0007Qo-Ao; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:10:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4F28748A.1050103@alice.it> (Angelo Graziosi's message of "Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:08:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148080 Archived-At: Angelo Graziosi writes: > Hi guys... > > any news? which is the final decision? We won't do it in Emacs 24.1 for sure, since we are well into pretest. I have no major objection to including AUCTeX in future Emacs releases, if the AUCTeX developers are amenable and willing to help do the integration work (stuff like using define-derived-mode and completion-at-point). (Personally, I prefer using tex-mode.el because AUCTeX "feels" a bit too heavyweight for me, but I can see how AUCTeX's features would be a draw for most.)