From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `report-emacs-bug' prompting rework Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:54:48 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87pqdiz9ef.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87vcney2in.fsf@gnus.org> <87lioapk26.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hayygl6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqdlmog5.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329170118 24732 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2012 21:55:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:55:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 22:55:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rf-0007Z4-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:55:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rf-0006SK-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:55:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rc-0006S4-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rb-0006u1-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rb-0006tv-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3rZ-0007WE-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:55:09 +0100 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:55:09 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:55:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bQCsL26v/wuJcAYwdY9JWTyO0M4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148586 Archived-At: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:31:22 -0500 Ted Zlatanov wrote: TZ> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:26:02 +0800 Jason Rumney wrote: JR> Ted Zlatanov writes: >>> I still think Emacs bugs should be simply reported through a HTTP (REST >>> or whatever) call. That would cover the most users and we can use >>> confirmation e-mails to avoid spamming. TZ> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:08 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: SJT> Why can't we have both? TZ> I'd love that: sendmail or SMTP for those who want it, and HTTP for TZ> those who need it. TZ> The web form would take some work for the confirmation e-mails, but TZ> surely it would be worth it? Would it help if I put it together? Ping? Anyone interested in getting this going? Ted