From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13594: 24.2.92; [PATCH] compilation-start doesn't consider nil OUTWIN Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:28:59 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87pq07b4k4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87sj5apclq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87r4ktoinh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87mwvhxehw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zjzfz0nq.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <51161554.9010609@gmx.at> <8738x4o5cp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5117D9B5.5090203@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360575774 15812 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2013 09:42:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13594@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Liu To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 10:43:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4pun-0000uz-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:43:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36328 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4puU-0004qF-8T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4puP-0004lo-Ry for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4puN-0007lD-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4puN-0007l9-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4pug-0000zL-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 13594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13594.13605757343739 (code B ref 13594); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2013 09:42:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ptu-0000yG-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:36345 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4ptq-0000xz-J4 for 13594@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:42:11 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C50E20199072F; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:41:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5117D9B5.5090203@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:32:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71048 Archived-At: >> But such some window at any cost should be harmless when the caller goes >> to use the returned window e.g. to get its buffer with `window-buffer', etc. > > Returning the selected window is harmless. Only if it displays the requested buffer. Do you think it is possible to implement a special "hidden" window type so callers could operate on it invisibly to the user?