From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17562: 24.4.50; REGRESSION: mouse double-click on `(` does not select whole Lisp sexp Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 20:18:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppizulue.fsf@web.de> References: <28b9c286-b99c-42b1-9768-d39a449a9855@default> <87tx8cdorb.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401214777 3393 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2014 18:19:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:19:37 +0000 (UTC) To: 17562@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 27 20:19:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLyB-0001Nc-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:19:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLyB-0004eB-83 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLy0-0004dx-C1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:19:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLxn-0008Da-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLxn-0008DV-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLxm-0003jz-Eh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17562.140121471914340 (code B ref 17562); Tue, 27 May 2014 18:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2014 18:18:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLxK-0003j9-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:63594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WpLxD-0003ir-SG for 17562@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 14:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.47.11]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3gLx-1WXp6L44v3-00rDDc; Tue, 27 May 2014 20:18:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 27 May 2014 01:08:30 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+fHoiLT1eOZihTzTrqU28JcOhxLbupYIys21oU9eVFebinGXadJ Iu76UlSNRayRVzB/AaToXb3pqj7uEqPAKuDmnTwDeEDwFtbCLIl/jN2zNC36+7hCWStSlOr an0BPwua5VyIWMiPIJ4tDsBM/Yg+Hwocr7Ati7zx0tlETnY8v4v+WQWiaBFrS0yVMkS4By1 JFCkccuKSjLRkm8yb2Rfg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89573 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, > The old code used a hack to work around the problem, and I installed > another hack that does something morally very similar, although it gets > there in a fairly different way. > > In both the old and the new code you can still get the undesired > behavior if you move your mouse slightly between the second down-mouse > and the second up-mouse. For me it works sufficiently well with your hack, thanks. Michael.