From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master c6f03ed: Fix a problem in url.el without GnuTLS Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:47:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87ppbquo97.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20141211155740.11916.1584@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418316689 27188 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2014 16:51:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 17:51:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6xV-00032n-LN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:51:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6xV-00069u-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:51:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6uP-0003DD-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:48:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6uF-0003ec-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]:49038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6uF-0003eW-EZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:47:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so5397466pad.38 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:47:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=eaqwud1zBSo1ageNuh0dz8C85Hc4KFps/lizMmZciYI=; b=Zsmc1lXsmq6jZTeThdOejSsCObpRUL2mWFeFtVMjzru2/XgbMThb8jBRd8bunak6fD vbJLoSglywFEVEGJSHjm6AJnlXTMMq4YGT/NAgMitV6gRmRCC1F4qir25P3k0B9jjwgr bNdiNCu97cr5J5LE/Oq2Kcnhf8zRLOMZeFL2PMJ0UZevMG/04sThFFzHpVP1Iz+rV3mU kzkFEasABb84NGZZtvnxyEYruGfI+SBz252dF4mcuZzIbhVAEjs7pbdfP9RW1APkAnd0 FElLD1J7fq+IWAsCmWlM2SrrcJm1XnBRsfOC6g8C6qFAz1nwxmRuGjAvOZ5arH7pkGHc Wg9w== X-Received: by 10.66.102.97 with SMTP id fn1mr16615329pab.26.1418316475648; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:47:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from fortuna ([114.248.243.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nt6sm1858504pdb.26.2014.12.11.08.47.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:47:54 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:57:41 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (CentOS Linux 7 (Core)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179795 Archived-At: On 2014-12-11 15:57 +0000, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > + (when (and (fboundp 'gnutls-available-p) > + (gnutls-available-p)) Does this defeat the purpose of gnutls-available-p? BTW, why aren't all these -available-p functions replaced by features? Leo