From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch queue management systems Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:49:46 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87ppbqfap1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <546D2E75.6090701@cs.ucla.edu> <54762721.4060908@cs.ucla.edu> <17zjb2h650.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <86mw71pl6d.fsf@yandex.ru> <83fvct145r.fsf@gnu.org> <5486F304.9030101@yandex.ru> <83iohkwy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <54872EA6.9090405@yandex.ru> <83egs8wwr6.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3w7a7sr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bnna5rp7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bnnagsi0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx12fbs2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418313039 27941 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2014 15:50:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:50:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 16:50:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz60X-000642-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:50:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52172 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz60X-0002eg-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz60N-0002Q8-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz60I-0005Mo-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz60I-0005MM-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz606-0005g0-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:49:58 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f47667.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.244.118.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:49:58 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f47667.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:49:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f47667.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:58929eIQkqhv0/Rg+79OCXgDCa0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179777 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:26:21 +0100 David Kastrup wrote: > > DK> Ted Zlatanov writes: >>> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:55:35 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: >>> > AS> David Kastrup writes: >>>>> Doesn't need a separate repo: a server side commit hook refusing >>>>> non-fast-forward pushes (more exactly: updating the reference after the >>>>> commit object is already there) on any path not starting, say, with >>>>> dev/, should be easily possible. >>> > AS> Doesn't even need that as long as you can delete branches. >>> >>> Doesn't even need that as long as we have Github. > > DK> We don't "have" GitHub. It's owned by a company and is running > DK> proprietary software to which we don't have access. > > Sorry, I forgot to add sarcasm tags. It isn't sarcasm if an overwhelming majority of readers would not know the difference. This happens to be a publicly archived mailing list. -- David Kastrup