From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Debbugs pseudo-headers in comments Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:17:56 +0000 Message-ID: <87pp9pfn2j.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <87y4oef823.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423081112 1407 80.91.229.3 (4 Feb 2015 20:18:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:18:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 04 21:18:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6P2-0003sR-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 21:18:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6P1-0004g0-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:18:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6Ox-0004ej-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:18:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6Ov-0004BJ-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:18:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2]:37908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6Ov-000487-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:18:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=fASUzxldnHZEGqHy2KpWbKX4mp5aXX1FpkDSAwf7hnU=; b=h0IHSh28PQpKYpt7ngY0IdmtQHIcEOTwUzhVtI/+gEoPZ0hZf7f8CKQlPyuOzPg3wqoLnJ9h9W+OpAmy3J4Hdul7WXsnMbOd9jrwuYU5gSFQ8M/u2Z635dCdRj4AbGMC85VA6iVAc+TAv/CrM2jx08TSpM88m9DEiBmx4m1YmDQ=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6Oi-0004v2-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:18:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ6Ob-0001kf-44 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:17:57 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Carlos Pita's message of "Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:24:15 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a01:4f8:d15:1b86::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182400 Archived-At: >>>>> Carlos Pita writes: [=E2=80=A6] > Just another related question: when I send a bug report I get an > acknowledgement with a subject with the following format: > bug#NNNN: Acknowledgement () > The Reply-To header of this response is correctly set to the bug > address, but AFAICS in the mailing list most follow-ups don't include > the "Acknowledgement()" part in the subject header (although some of > them, including some of mine -shame on me-, do include it). So most > of the time they're not just mindless replies to the acknowledgement. > Some of them could be replies to follow-ups, fine. But sometimes the > bug reporter becomes its own commenter. So what do you do in these > cases: > 1) Reply to the acknowledgement without modifying the subject. > 2) Reply to the acknowledgement editing the subject to remove the > "Acknowledgement ()" part. > 3) Write a mail from scratch copy-pasting the bug description to the > subject. > 4) Another more sophisticated option I'm not aware of. The problem with 1=E2=80=923 is that these tear the respective discussion thread. To avoid that, =E2=80=93 try to get the initial message =E2=80=93 /as modified by Debbugs,/ =E2=80=93 and reply to that. I know of several means to do that: =E2=80=A2 subscribe to the bug-gnu-emacs@ mailing list; you will get all the Debbugs mail (sans pure-control@ messages), /including/ your own bug reports; =E2=80=A2 go to http://debbugs.gnu.org/=E2=9F=A8bug-number=E2=9F=A9 and fe= tch the initial message (or all the messages associated with that report) in Unix mbox format; per my experience, mail user agents typically allow browsing mbox files as mail folders, /and/ replying to messages stored within them; =E2=80=A2 subscribe to nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs (the NNTP mirror of the bug-gnu-emacs@ mailing list) and find the message of interest there; you=E2=80=99ll probably still want to reply via email (/not/ NNTP); for Gnus, M-x gnus-summary-wide-reply will do just that. Alternatively, since Debbugs uses Resent-Message-Id:, it=E2=80=99s possible to just reply to the original message itself (assuming you save a copy of outgoing mail) =E2=80=93 /but be sure/ to fix the To: header to point to the correct =E2=9F=A8bug-number=E2=9F=A9@ email. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A