From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnutls tofu support? or even --insecure? Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:50:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87pp2r1k7q.fsf@esperi.org.uk> References: <87lhdic9dy.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <838u9hq2hp.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhdg7ifi.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <868u9g73mj.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439466640 1365 80.91.229.3 (13 Aug 2015 11:50:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:50:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 13 13:50:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPr1b-0004Fq-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 13:50:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPr1a-00078H-J7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPr1M-000767-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPr1I-0005ws-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:58991 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPr1I-0005sF-L4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 07:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from spindle (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t7DBo2uc025198 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:50:02 +0100 Emacs: it's not slow --- it's stately. In-Reply-To: <868u9g73mj.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:39:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: spindle 1290; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188773 Archived-At: On 12 Aug 2015, Steinar Bang told this: >>>>>> Nix : > >> Tried that. This is, it seems, one of those bugs that goes away when you >> look more closely at it. > > (aka. a "heisenbug"...) I've managed to reproduce it even in high verbosity: *sending* mail is still broken. Time to debug... -- NULL && (void)