From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Not getting replies from the orgmode list to my e-mail address Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:17:43 -0400 Message-ID: <87pp297w3c.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87egiqjmd9.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8737z6nn2i.fsf@yale.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUfGi-0003yk-8e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:17:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUfGf-0002dp-1v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:17:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com ([209.85.192.54]:33996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUfGe-0002d2-TT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:17:48 -0400 Received: by qgeg42 with SMTP id g42so132155648qge.1 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat-130-132-173-5.central.yale.edu. [130.132.173.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d108sm16918174qga.6.2015.08.26.11.17.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8737z6nn2i.fsf@yale.edu> (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:25:57 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org jorge.alfaro-murillo@yale.edu (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) writes: > Eric S Fraga writes: > >> Replies need not be written to go to both you and the list. > > I would add: and should not. Otherwise people subscribed to the list > get the message twice. Directing a reply to somebody and cc'ing the list is common practice on many lists, including this list and emacs.devel. If you want to avoid duplicates, you'll have better luck filtering on your end. You can set the Mail-Followup-To header, but others' MUAs might not respect it. While I don't think this is true here, it's also worth being aware that some lists discourage using Mail-Followup-To. For example http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/56264/ -- Kyle