From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:53:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87pozgp5hx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9kscqig.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vb98jqwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2poba1s.fsf@red-bean.com> <83si4cjnyw.fsf@gnu.org> <83oaf0jmcg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447278979 5544 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 21:56:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, Emacs development discussions To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 22:56:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdNI-0001HZ-Ra for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:56:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43217 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdNI-0007TH-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdMQ-0006aa-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdMO-0006xt-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:55:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdMM-0006vG-2Q; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47545 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwdMI-0001kJ-52; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5A2FE41E1; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:53:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Karl Fogel's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:08:43 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194162 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:58 PM, John Wiegley wrote: > >> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> 2. When electric-indent-mode is on, C-o behaves in an unexpected >> fashion. >> > Then what is it that electric-indent-mode gives you that prevents you >> > personally from turning it off? >> >> I want electric-indent-mode; I don't want C-o at column zero to be >> affected by >> it. I think that by default, it shouldn't be affected by it either. See my >> proposed solution in another e-mail. >> > > So electric-indent-mode would still affect open-line, but not when > open-line is run with point at column zero. Personally I want the dumb C-o regardless of the current column. -- David Kastrup