From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22614: 25.1.50; ../../emacs/lisp/net/eww.el:29:1:Error: =?UTF-8?Q?Symbol=E2=80=99s?= value as variable is void: image-map Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:50:21 +1100 Message-ID: <87pow3oqgy.fsf@gnus.org> References: <868u2s1ydw.fsf@boetes.org> <85lh6so6p5.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455162687 5102 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2016 03:51:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wjenkner@inode.at, 22614@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 04:51:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHd-0002CN-8n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:51:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHc-0004xV-Oh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHZ-0004xE-9C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHW-0005Lk-2x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHV-0005Lg-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHV-000846-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22614 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22614-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22614.145516265330987 (code B ref 22614); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22614) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2016 03:50:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35571 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHN-00083j-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:49987) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiHL-00083a-2z for 22614@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aTiGw-0004Gr-TN; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:50:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:16:57 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aTiGw-0004Gr-TN MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1455767427.71575@shjgj0Mz4wHDARGaXtzc9g X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112881 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > This (ie, defining something from image.el in shr.el just to stop a void > variable error) seems sub-optimal to me. Can't shr use something like > "(when (featurep 'image) ...)" instead? Yeah, I think that's a better idea. I'll make the change. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no