From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22739: 25.0.50; Hangs on revertig buffer Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 05:39:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87pov8dxtv.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87lh6hcr2o.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ziuxru6l.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9h4dg3q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <8737s48kea.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83io10w9vz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457239220 32248 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2016 04:40:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 04:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22739@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 05:40:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1acQUD-0002fx-BE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 05:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49162 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acQUC-0002cp-DA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acQU9-0002au-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acQU6-0000hw-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acQU6-0000hs-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acQU5-0006Ye-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 04:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22739 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22739-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22739.145723917525166 (code B ref 22739); Sun, 06 Mar 2016 04:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22739) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2016 04:39:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acQTf-0006Xq-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:39:35 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp20.acens.net ([86.109.99.144]:57736 helo=smtp.movistar.es) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1acQTc-0006XX-UO for 22739@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:39:33 -0500 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0201.56DBB47D.0112, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Original-Received: from qcore (79.153.146.151) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 56B309D8026ECA96; Sun, 6 Mar 2016 04:39:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83io10w9vz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 06 Mar 2016 05:41:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114470 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > We don't have any mechanism in the display engine for "refusing to > display a line", AFAIK. What about scanning the contents before entering display?