From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480684881 370 195.159.176.226 (2 Dec 2016 13:21:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:21:21 +0000 (UTC) To: Glenn Morris , 25084@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 02 14:21:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnm4-00077V-6y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:21:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34509 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnm8-000087-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnly-00007x-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlu-0000QH-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlu-0000QD-4K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlt-00050h-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25084 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25084-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25084.148068482719208 (code B ref 25084); Fri, 02 Dec 2016 13:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2016 13:20:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlL-0004zk-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:20:27 -0500 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:41839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlK-0004zX-5n for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:20:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1480684820; bh=XyxFE+M9spr3iJF2Ft8YRuv4hiTcgPQEXAJU1CRhnVA=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0h2chi/VvH+zOFd8phOEXZuyTZqReBNp9H3LJT/ZZ9sZPdyoL7gQl+h5ygTsNlajlG7pHkLeTcmaugx6xfU24qcjWVszWfcqfgZ63tXC2+hpXJTu58VanDw0wL4hB3pTkLMYC+nNPdBqCZPWnnP6/GWplPgw4yYYuOBo25iFfsQ= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126407 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Glenn Morris writes: Hi Glenn, > In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. > This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a > bootstrap. It was, but I might have pulled a commit after bootstrapping (Eli mentioned that reason to me, and while I don't remember doing that, it has to be the case). > It causes building to recompile files.el, which is harmless but should > not be needed in a release. Indeed. I'll keep this bug report open until the next pretest. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEbBAEBCAAGBQJYQXUSAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQzoEH93DCgAWQNokfQU5GZ1B+/qP5 zc51s4WLe3vEXRzFS6pmlDpQ21VqKZgX2BZKC0P3NZr5fgUOKYN3yuHKQx95cprf p63fvsx3b1InKEkqJUlr15BoU0NcctJ3ImDBSC4p3xXgSLH7uBHN53XZ+XUnt2eM 50RhPTihWprnQx27e/D41JGN6G4WyVQvyST1N5rgbywjipMqiIJiXJMjjhzSMej5 SiRAM0iIUQB+s1/i4ES+eWzGAvTCAToCi9IJE28HN4FNM7e2YbGcVRyBB+vo/Fri trGsXtPf0t4O0Kupq4RZK4LFivCKSNOa5WLEihLLGmv2Ddye1dJYcOFr7kSmwA== =CsW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--