From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26589: Can't built Emacs from source (both master and 25.1 from tarball fail) Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:07:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87pog4pb96.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <83bmrpacni.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26co228.fsf@xi.bootis> <87y3uspdwt.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87lgqswcvy.fsf@xi.bootis> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492884377 31432 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 18:06:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:06:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Cadadr , 26589@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 20:06:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQA-0007xy-91 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 20:06:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQC-0000hZ-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQ7-0000hU-7w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQ2-0003BR-9y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQ1-0003B3-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zQ1-0005TF-OT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 26589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26589.149288433821000 (code B ref 26589); Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2017 18:05:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34660 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zPd-0005Se-SI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:05:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:33297) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1zPd-0005SS-70 for 26589@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 14:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id z67so5787737itb.0 for <26589@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:05:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bzN3eRvQCCijFO+KeHAB8xCuSlD/QfjObUGVHjNYbC4=; b=sK0gpI7PiNTHiGf56/GEi2TreyKT5VyGEN5jToXlnh66xQUQ6q+jtSsyup/TeITRHT YVhlJvMOtgtIHzhlboDoBETIZPumRD85uzf8UD7CjZa64w0Wzc0ZRHijk1piyGu539RC x9qIXlN10Yei25JELHA75krITWST6YDw5ZMLVSrw3NshWVHKmV1pTC6yyQ4ZAw4poWxG E7mcC4qjC5hjiVBta4vy+7WA0gpfxqqHA8mOSRGZV4P1JpnWDXTBnJstV2QLF3JFUmnl UtWutm0jxg1gIn+QfOPLaSARQZ0s0kvThRJlKXz5Khswkjj66rL55JbcOAGm8XieOntz X66A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bzN3eRvQCCijFO+KeHAB8xCuSlD/QfjObUGVHjNYbC4=; b=EO8xSzweQfbo4nZZOf99nXACce9B2kbsm93X1UiKOkXkHBI7yuC4pZ+6UzWqI4uWLE /CmEy5b8u0KK/x3Cl6/t5Eu/xtjIKFuVconCT+CjI6Xk7kwzMrXM+MwooX80ljoIikn4 PN/LE2r2LD9RaFbE7KkUiruVnm2bikUv3kcY8ciOwR6xLszMmPbraWkCzlfLk0oMvZku fwQ8ra5svrKYCLDlE5Affu1xuDSlTx6Eqs6+AMmdm0DNBvN4LoTyDLdupAho1zyzFGV7 tdeCEyZQAe4XluukjgAbi37EA5qni0eA8Q2KSnGokTmukwxZTX09DQ0CXD0XiHSjS41r ha7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7ISo0UDqbgl6mU6GJqcKI1nuotcbMRJuj5CXJpI0YsTit/FJWI cU1q8iZ6Wpe79kJe X-Received: by 10.36.104.213 with SMTP id v204mr5075995itb.65.1492884331901; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d139sm2222185itd.6.2017.04.22.11.05.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:05:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lgqswcvy.fsf@xi.bootis> ("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F?= Kayaalp"'s message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2017 20:49:53 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131883 Archived-At: G=C3=B6ktu=C4=9F Kayaalp writes: > On 2017-04-22 13:09 +04, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >> >> The segfault during building sounds like the rel_alloc thing; even if >> you can build 25.1 on Fedora without REL_ALLOC=3Dno it's probably just a >> coincidence. That build will likely crash later. > > I actually use whatever is the default value for REL_ALLOC, and I only > have built master as of today (eb52828a439f674733ba70844b795c6673733572). Ah, master (or 25.2) default to REL_ALLOC=3Dno anyway, so you shouldn't have any problem then (also, they should theoretically work even with REL_ALLOC=3Dyes).