From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27169: eshell/sudo doesn't work with protected directories Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:49:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87poeevvcy.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87bmq0x8bm.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9B3DCDF4-DA3C-40CB-B5E6-61FD2BB6DEC8@gmail.com> <92D4739F-7FCF-4658-B0C0-D20CEB863150@gmail.com> <8760g7xpxs.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <565849C0-5191-4FD9-A012-0FA9237B89CA@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496969296 3940 195.159.176.226 (9 Jun 2017 00:48:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 00:48:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 27169@debbugs.gnu.org To: Yegor Timoshenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 09 02:48:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85x-0000Xk-LP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 02:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ861-000102-6W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:48:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85v-0000zi-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85q-0005pW-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85q-0005pO-2q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85p-0000jj-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27169 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 27169-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27169.14969692572801 (code B ref 27169); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27169) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2017 00:47:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35636 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85Q-0000j7-VK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:36359) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dJ85O-0000ir-TM for 27169@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y77so27245740ioe.3 for <27169@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:47:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=N4VvlhvYtlVTZf5qYhTECrCHrpRF1BrnhHe3506fUvc=; b=MB0YbhRJ8Y58qbHNNvcgG8ZuelYfwZnepTXWNKimMSNoaM9OJSGoH/fgXDdKqYW7t9 r3O7X/FuywMcTd6qf9xDl7Vy8rQsgDqyaxkFK0VhYnw3kyAkrsVOx3fvAo7qZj7+0l9h G2h3iAk514aXH3xpZVh/hnxgFtIDC728T15dr8TrvpZtFLRI6xcU2ydQR6exXo8wvWRg +kuvy3CiZtwdBgwSGvGCUbpmxP35Vf7UcxVyifi3ahdQUdmDd7rW9uV+e09o5b+SB1gq Ass8wpJN///V/MUnYdIol1Kj1BWWd08jT1ausqo5QBgd8AkSx9w5/ZWUqdxSjLD2+Tz5 VAQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=N4VvlhvYtlVTZf5qYhTECrCHrpRF1BrnhHe3506fUvc=; b=uhKE6Ab5rY11l0RR1aYOG/UH8gFYwiZCQbnzezI0nLzImfhNJTv3CVH9nV6pf8rxty 72UqbwIBPF9nP99flHHX+P0yMLMQoItnOzefHP+j6sa34biYi10Fjsc+rYmd0P0IlOYQ WHAMUGOSUHcWWozzKXF7Zrba3btvAGcZFZeo9xZCe9duyENyvs0DForkwS5WKfsntk/n f+/VHxpyojbnnr+VzwW9XZirl1vdfthfmFdayZZ0ICdi69VBlmGOZIOLenu9Ku9rUk15 lGC/EJViCSDwQag84efvsWkA7Dx9zRUDA3+zLO5QPGsE2S/HvNrQIhfQnZFLwgs7J8Ms zotg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBmii+V4b7tsPETVhS/bFDJF1yPTeoje3RziuxCFDv9o7ZKXFbC F+TXkc1AfsWi+meZ X-Received: by 10.107.169.17 with SMTP id s17mr39099879ioe.1.1496969249039; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:47:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm419794itu.1.2017.06.08.17.47.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <565849C0-5191-4FD9-A012-0FA9237B89CA@gmail.com> (Yegor Timoshenko's message of "Fri, 9 Jun 2017 01:21:05 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:133414 Archived-At: Yegor Timoshenko writes: >> Don't you also need (push 'eshell-tramp eshell-modules-list)? > > I never did that and it seemed to work fine (I had to manually alias > sudo to eshell/sudo, though). Aha, that explains it. >> Does this work from M-x shell? > > No, this one is specific to eshell (actually, to em-tramp > eshell/sudo). So by "No" you mean "Yes" (it works)? ;) >> Does C-x C-f /sudo::/tmp/a/ work? > > It works. > >> Does it make a difference if you run from the terminal vs running >> graphically (there's at least one macOS bug where this makes a >> difference, #21573). > > It is reproducible both in graphical and terminal environments. Hmm, if you step through eshell-plain-command does it call eshell-lisp-command or eshell-external-command to run "ls"? (for me it goes through eshell-lisp-command)