Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Oh, yes, I was confused by your docstring.  By "if no match found" you
> meant when the line doesn't match ^foo^bar^ at all; I had somehow got
> the impression you meant that there was no match for "foo".

Ah, yes, I'll try to make the docstring a bit more clear!

> This eq test will always be nil, right?  Because the only time it's t
> is when you pass something that's not a history reference, but the thing
> we passed is a history reference by construction.  So this could be
> simplified to

Yup, that's true, I'll simplify that down.

Here's a patch which tries to fix those issues.

Thanks again,
-Jay