From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alex Branham Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:29:19 -0500 Message-ID: <87po2ztebk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0yz2pxd.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87r2nfteik.fsf@gmail.com> <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523888834 9653 195.159.176.226 (16 Apr 2018 14:27:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:27:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 16:27:09 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8565-0002PP-B6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49821 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f858B-000489-On for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f857z-00044l-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f857u-0004zm-0c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f857t-0004zX-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:29:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f857t-0002YP-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Branham Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 31179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31179.15238888899758 (code B ref 31179); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:28:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f856z-0002XG-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:38031) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f856u-0002Wi-Nu for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id y20-v6so3213162oix.5 for <31179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:28:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=UzuxaBDun8l8ie6vcyCEV493DgrhmZas0UetgMxGzk4=; b=vfgSk9K65GYWkSiSd0n1VLKAFI1IU1rwVFEs6/H8bhS5X9z6DUIsEFDOBzUvt729h+ eP3sqm91kboeP7GLxrvp4XUiOt4ya9NkCeM96R60EAW+vYclHv+hPg4KfyS6NUk1J/KJ 8Zq7cZnalMKm/paOPwIt/xzPFbdVCMNr9W9lJ7vau6l1SqfYY5Be4k8L4bx3S1gVv0EJ 2nWTpXvzvnJw/jtxhBak8pb79znNccHugG00J/GkPBfZF5TOsPzcbnX3KYrCKmq6JTNp iYJmQB5M7Vm4hc/uim1AmM2NYD9QXaGKtUmxtpYcQgeCQ8XMM3iK/mNxWZx5/OsyW3LR jPNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UzuxaBDun8l8ie6vcyCEV493DgrhmZas0UetgMxGzk4=; b=DKm1j2X1aeHW0vW/pCmB5Vb4K9WLP8vYyXjmT7d1FDzAJOZMUuW5mabeGMEG5SAXeJ KSnbCnAZhhASj/yH8S6ikPkmLb0/8rMim1smyFTkEB+osvia5EskuqqGd5yYVbpCKxWq C75dqKZiJHc7lS2rJufzf8TAMysW02VIzDCW7sx5pZcR7JibqKZ2SyqlSvZ1hEJIgyPL UjOWo7y6YBmEsb69pi9rE+AQAHAFzqhC2lbpe8gSJjoAnZnGKhfpGr+TUQX/TSk52Dun JeXt/H+VL6ioWjSU51QuVTKoMoWslAdgvVSnEt+IS4fmqvavF0tjFXgmmPcUx1eHFpfg 6CiA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDpfSRsA2CUg8o+bcCDvQCaDjvAvCXluXOkGRf0V49cEZcQKCzj qrVbjQASunGZyHAD2QPOQIK6WgN9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/WDuK9nVkmGt1vSQrMizWv26031GrEqF7s/HKlv5oZdGwJvAWPm07HrnslV3u0ntwsGkHoIA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:3d82:: with SMTP id k124-v6mr15839636oia.168.1523888874999; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from mars (nat-128-62-57-160.public.utexas.edu. [128.62.57.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b81-v6sm3266428oia.50.2018.04.16.07.27.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:27:54 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <874lkb2poo.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:145444 Archived-At: On Mon 16 Apr 2018 at 09:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Alex Branham writes: > >>> What processes are these? >> >> For that example url I gave, I have in M-x list-processes: >> >> resources.bl... -- open -- -- (network connection to >> resources.blogblog.com) >> www.blogger.com -- open -- -- (network connection to www.blogger.com) >> www.mostlyma... -- open -- -- (network connection to >> www.mostlymaths.net) > > Well, those are open network connections (which url.el keeps around), > and aren't processes, and should consume approximately zero CPU... The situation definitely improves for me after closing the eww buffer, but Emacs is still sluggish. I assumed these extra processes were to blame, but perhaps that's not right. I don't know what else could be the culprit though.