From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Alternatives to inlinetasks? [was: Problems created by inlinetasks in agenda views] Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 01:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87po2lsfsg.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <23248.48530.817172.917300@frac.u-strasbg.fr> <87in8ricbd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <23261.58554.814734.521862@frac.u-strasbg.fr> <87sh7m0zsd.fsf@gmail.com> <871sf5pr4t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBqPT-0007yi-2u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fBqPQ-0001IS-Pc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:43 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode list , Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr, Nicolas Goaziou Hi Nicolas and Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > Either we keep it as the hack, or use the limitation you > mention and get rid of the END line. I think getting rid of the END line goes in the right direction... > But I am not sure it is really with the trouble to replace a bad > hack with a slightly better hack. ... but I'm definily not sure neither. I'd favor a solution where inline tasks are really simple: 0. Prevent cycling for tasks with a high number of stars ("high" being defined by the user as an option). 1. Allow TODO keywords, priority, tags, SCHEDULED and DEADLINE but nothing else. 2. Archiving and refiling DTRT. 3. ... and we move org-inlinetask.el outside of Org's core. ******************** is really too much clutter and we can simplify things by saying "more than X stars are going to be inline tasks by default". WDYT? -- Bastien