From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31782: 26.1; dired-recursive-deletes broken Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:55:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87po0vy8ja.fsf@gmail.com> References: <834li9qlu3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528840458 16218 195.159.176.226 (12 Jun 2018 21:54:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:54:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31782@debbugs.gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 12 23:54:13 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrEx-00046m-EE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:54:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrH4-00023x-Nz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGq-0001wv-4c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGk-00030D-N5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGk-000302-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGk-0001Gt-9Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31782 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31782-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31782.15288405324844 (code B ref 31782); Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31782) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2018 21:55:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGF-0001G4-QE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:43116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fSrGD-0001Fr-R0 for 31782@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id t6-v6so1170884iob.10 for <31782@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lbjeTEdG9sbCbajOYibqE9/bBr5OZlOgC42Bcs/P7oA=; b=HmxLtFdguliAfQt/Fg+dGuoe9GjBtqmUI07HXspBJVlgABfeQOFgFsEg3kchOJTbUj YZayzBhNyCidgkdJC92sRhUrpsh9Y+37OczyfMN08n37IhbgGzJLJWRapUiifKisbRqj lfHslr0NOVg+ugCOdXiT15f1CS3jCJNigGkOSB8VrQd8fYhuHOdLGvcpF9cRyUCzGJ4v 2cmu6Rc9iQLEvzEvP2hzMum1ONlK1toLRyvKtcgpX7ySYtyx2JABAD/6j1VfLAUKqkBe gvC+mmZFdRRbv188lU2HYfGONSFBZPwDVao7/FGuP0NkhFmCzfGSVtWuL5gJBAkIhMI3 vtVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lbjeTEdG9sbCbajOYibqE9/bBr5OZlOgC42Bcs/P7oA=; b=kYz0xsywOoXGQnPx0A3YLm7JVFvAQw79G5+sIuWvKMSa8bc+lOLpU/5bG33coX7elU Bl4shNbsLl2TzV3X0aAcDleetmtaeCWfh7iIMCpw7Gil4DRFg6yVagGiHxzm6nwvkXRg wMYKLl1OwGoNg1zfvgwM94RyjvtT1Bf0aWYw9nm9EIPgYxt0vT7oXB3C2ea82nPSOnKw k/tuI/UDcY2ZdGjN5mWlBaP6SX1OSz+UlPffMDeP+FqfITVEV3NfrDiZylbKahTVbfMl 1dgcpHHuMmWFwf0B2+jH04B1MyccKFo5vAuG/jwDQcPMIUL64L9egFqMkpRwzY+T9r1D +Ifw== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1qEfP2K9wt1cx3d0HURqHzKL/Iw9o0Kc2nNV4p2x7n82ydCSw6 xAqqQ/j4efXm1lShRIPN9N0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIpNvvieblzSMGciyrwXCkAuZP7QXk65U1rYwX8tL87e+jYW8fmO+2S5ABb7bF+BKQWshIQww== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3281:: with SMTP id y123-v6mr2328253ioy.188.1528840524262; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e202-v6sm339875ioe.0.2018.06.12.14.55.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834li9qlu3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:23:00 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147341 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 10:33:50 -0400 >> Cc: 31782@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > I am annoyed to answer this question in 26.1 constantly >> > >> > Recursively trash XXX? [yes, no, all, quit, help] >> > >> > Previously there is only yes or no (which I replace with y or n). Now I >> > have to type all of these things. >> >> I think this is solved in the master branch. See Bug#30073. > > Should we backport that to the emacs-26 branch? Probably yes. I have the impression that yes-or-no-p is sort of a counterexample to what Leo mentioned in Bug#31772; that is, many (most?) people are not very happy with it, but it's so easy to just do (fset 'yes-or-no-p #'y-or-n-p) so nobody bothers to complain about it. But it's a "customization" that breaks down in cases like this one.