* Re: Interaction of Agenda with DEADLINE & SCHEDULED
2019-03-27 0:49 Interaction of Agenda with DEADLINE & SCHEDULED Stephan Fabel
@ 2019-04-20 7:54 ` Ihor Radchenko
2019-04-26 22:30 ` Stephan Fabel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ihor Radchenko @ 2019-04-20 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephan Fabel, emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4426 bytes --]
Hi,
There seems to be not much interest about this email, so I doubt that
the described functionality will be added to org any time soon.
However, let me try to give you some hints, which might be useful for
your personal config.
> For example, how would one create a custom agenda view that
>
> - shows all accomplished tasks within the DEADLINE last week
> - shows all accomplished tasks that missed the DEADLINE last week
>
> Then does the same for the coming week, i.e.
>
> - show all tasks which are due in the next week, i.e., within the
> DEADLINE
> - show all tasks which are overdue
There is org-super-agenda package
(https://github.com/alphapapa/org-super-agenda), which already have a
part of the functionality. You can use :scheduled and :deadline
selectors as a starting point to achieve what you want.
A more direct way to approach this is a custom skip function. As a
starting point, see my own skip function for filter todo items with
deadline, but scheduled in future:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defun org-agenda-skip-deadlines-before-schedule ()
"Skip tasks, with deadline and scheduled in future and tasks without deadline."
(require 'org-agenda)
(org-with-wide-buffer
(let* ((tmp-deadline-time (flet ((org-back-to-heading (&rest args) t)) ; we should be at heading already and it consumes too much cpu time otherwise
(org-get-deadline-time (point))))
(tmp-scheduled-time (org-get-scheduled-time (point)))
(tmp-cur-deadline (time-to-days tmp-deadline-time))
(tmp-cur-schedule (time-to-days tmp-scheduled-time))
(tmp-cur-day (time-to-days (apply #'encode-time
(append '(0 0 0)
(list (nth 1 org-agenda-current-date))
(list (nth 0 org-agenda-current-date))
(list (nth 2 org-agenda-current-date)))))))
(when (or
(not tmp-deadline-time)
(and
tmp-scheduled-time
tmp-deadline-time
(> tmp-cur-schedule tmp-cur-day)
;;(> tmp-cur-deadline tmp-cur-day)
))
(re-search-forward (org-get-limited-outline-regexp) nil 'noerror)
(point)))))
#+end_src
> Ideally, the interaction could even be more informational, so for
> example, analysis of the available work time next week (assuming 40
> hours for example) vs. the total estimated effort of all of the above
> tasks, helping to answer the question of whether all tasks are even
> achievable given the amount of available work time.
>
> Another potential -and very valuable- analysis could be a recommendation
> of order given DEADLINE, priority and effort over a period of time, for
> example the next week. What should one do first, then second, etc. to
> maximize output over a given period of time?
What you want here is actually quite a complicated optimization problem,
which probably deserves a separate full project of its own.
I cannot comment much on this part since effort estimates never worked
for me.
Best,
Ihor
Stephan Fabel <stephan.fabel@gmail.com> writes:
> When creating a custom agenda view, it is often desirable to express a
> relationship between a given task and meaningful dates, such as DEADLINE
> and SCHEDULED. It seems that with org-mode, and especially in the agenda
> view, it is not (yet?) possible to express that.
>
> For example, how would one create a custom agenda view that
>
> - shows all accomplished tasks within the DEADLINE last week
> - shows all accomplished tasks that missed the DEADLINE last week
>
> Then does the same for the coming week, i.e.
>
> - show all tasks which are due in the next week, i.e., within the
> DEADLINE
> - show all tasks which are overdue
>
> Ideally, the interaction could even be more informational, so for
> example, analysis of the available work time next week (assuming 40
> hours for example) vs. the total estimated effort of all of the above
> tasks, helping to answer the question of whether all tasks are even
> achievable given the amount of available work time.
>
> Another potential -and very valuable- analysis could be a recommendation
> of order given DEADLINE, priority and effort over a period of time, for
> example the next week. What should one do first, then second, etc. to
> maximize output over a given period of time?
>
> I have been looking for a discussion of these type of questions in the
> documentation, worg and other places like EmacsWiki and haven't really
> found anything.
>
> Thanks for any pointers,
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread