From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35507: Gnus mojibakifies UTF-8 text/x-patch attachments from Thunderbird Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 15:02:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnozfxgm.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <44a26585-7980-378c-9262-a567ddd3e617@cs.ucla.edu> <865zqv3tc2.fsf@gmail.com> <838svqqdp2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0l1o8p7.fsf@gmail.com> <86v9ytz5nk.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7g5njz1.fsf@gmail.com> <83imusq2zb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="10949"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35507@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, Noam Postavsky To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:17:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfYu-0012u5-O1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:17:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYmM-0000BH-TE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41127) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYmF-0000Aq-BE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYmE-0000x1-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYmE-0000wY-5g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYmD-0001J5-PR; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 14:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 35507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35507.15568921333660 (code B ref 35507); Fri, 03 May 2019 14:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 14:02:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYlQ-0000wV-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:45848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMYlN-0000qe-Vp for 35507@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 10:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id g57so6101194edc.12 for <35507@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:02:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=FE7Pqbv9IrBjl0G081dz2d48qIZgqErHWOewHhvBS3U=; b=Yfmu5156KMD9NDpiSD3grxkTcXCbH4H3L9tRnW+bP/0ShXxQyY0kTc9+h99/UJnlg3 t5dO21B9gdZu9dCsUOBIuxBlt6/mn9Rvt9pnDPffoGOermxfIfZJEfSXfqgn2bYNUpSO BXsduRMaeF1RWAsm7AQeGf23J8NKVpbZMFtBoajUZOSDmNLyxaBTQghMETFf1kuG+HRU +6IeKxNTmzgkFE+Fg9V1mHfZDGZvKYBLnwqrQKSmbIw4boZHjJZ6h6DHro/Mvd6DwZQL Hf7Z/PpYsDHkA67hVxzuExtDZ5A2SdUFVcyHEv/sZB3ztWqxnEzLeXD63YiUKErBuWai sE0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=FE7Pqbv9IrBjl0G081dz2d48qIZgqErHWOewHhvBS3U=; b=EGnsgmDgwzmfFB816aoVM9IL8WxCpPsQbNxnuGW7Rb+tvJ48MV9Deu/5S4n75Epy6Q pOGAf3qLdm+cIhNrL0cD4e5x22W85T3HKDQN7dYS8QNFOMCe7lHJfprD++8klfMcwVJT +IexKBxAB12AI5M/v22bb6ADmf2RKEl4e2zqo88G8COMBgvZI/jiyKAqZSWloylFXVPO wQQTcz+DrKXrFD9ehKoq9CiQwMPd8FtY/acTfeR9ZyXFmh1qtf8RjlXYfKMQcqApyUfM 8uBTdW1f9iuv5HIuoRQMkfYDvN/6Clsvk4aVy1zavHSKIXujlwjRKX6fhRmhpMsLctbO QMFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwCeRP6q3o7y5PjH74liYFki808m7t4AaQyU8AEQPBMCR/0ptV gkI611V1N5yDL73+1/YBUpfjHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzsz6sjB4adlrKdq6p72qDN4bjXLkHeI0Y020uTY38f9S5+9UEkUO+K2KI3xP3a4GY2NrQlqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a50:a305:: with SMTP id 5mr8430926edn.164.1556892124049; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([86.43.103.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm602138edd.15.2019.05.03.07.02.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 May 2019 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83imusq2zb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 2 May 2019 18:40:24 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158707 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 08:01:38 -0400 >> Cc: 35507@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> I understood from Paul's followup in https://debbugs.gnu.org/35507#32 >> that the report is mainly about the case where there is a Content-Type >> header with a charset field within the body of the attachment. > > Yes, that's my understanding as well. So I guess Gnus should try > gleaning the charset from there. The 'undecided' stuff is for when it > fails, I think. Question following an initial reading of (info "(elisp) Coding System Basics"): would it be better in this case to use prefer-utf-8 instead of undecided? If not, why not? Thanks, -- Basil