From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ctrl-[ ? Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 15:28:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnnqq1w1.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <08AC8151-5911-40FA-8B20-818B839D00AB@traduction-libre.org> <6F55E018-B15E-42B0-8794-21F55BBA23D3@traduction-libre.org> <34E3289C-10EE-4A23-AEE4-80D984DB2EDE@gnu.org> <6A538FF9-94C8-491D-B1B9-5C0D09FE7C39@acm.org> <838suesw93.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="265783"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 06 15:28:32 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRT-00170e-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 15:28:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRS-0004qk-N9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39689) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRL-0004qT-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRL-0001Cr-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=49712 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRK-00016I-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYsRH-0016oj-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 15:28:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:SzrVWTxfDSAvzsVs0wpT+l3ZqbI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237277 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Why is it useful to have different behavior on GUI and TTY frames? For those users who don't use Emacs on the terminal (not rare nowadays) finding that those keys as special is confusing and limiting, as demonstrated by this thread. So while it is not useful to have different behavior on GUI and TTY frames *by default*, it is not useful either to impose the limitations of TTY frames on GUI frames.