From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13400: 23.4; overlapping process filter calls Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87pnllsspr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r4ltpctd.fsf@wallace.tews.net> <87o91guoxl.fsf@gmail.com> <835znnnavb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="115590"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: hendrik@askra.de, 13400@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 04 02:03:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zR-000TyT-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 02:03:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zQ-00068E-3F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zL-00067w-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zK-0003vx-He for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zK-0003vt-Eu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3zK-0005hI-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 00:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 13400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13400.156487696821880 (code B ref 13400); Sun, 04 Aug 2019 00:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2019 00:02:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3z6-0005gq-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:02:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com ([209.85.166.50]:39076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hu3z4-0005gd-JP for 13400@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 20:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id f4so160209204ioh.6 for <13400@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8Os7gmOD9yo+dZdbUDcNffPLLrQzKn29CKEA96wHk8g=; b=msva4qiTlY0ZJdWwInXuiG72Y/qz0CvdZ/CK6wv4d+t6z4/kvoDSiAHY0LF0Ro9PM0 cmoqQKUJNTm7VBNCwi2OTMBP4mBSiU82tSHmXS871cUXNgubhq9Bu76ZI7s659rgK+oU nhdv9FIjCQ9B7e/qohYjpfofjYyfJKi9KFhPgruWiPl5xWVtoyP5D5uLq6BQCZPY4AEC TfEPsw8GMJniz39XBoCsdVRrYMR6fm6xUTYkdm955W4o8oznRbr9GkcHCojcrN1sWlDi 1cP1AGarf04abzvOugfyBXffve3CuooLn+uf2+0yZu10v9rk6a5gDh91d3UvW1jSdcKg TunA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8Os7gmOD9yo+dZdbUDcNffPLLrQzKn29CKEA96wHk8g=; b=AMDs/DoVWgxWxb0CHkD1U1+/10xULBf+e7CZ6xdLL5GR5Fax+a3F5PKjP1ezK6yBVm BsK9LKaydHqa7s/BoVl8fLTUsBGdZsjsqDfn5seoMvDYtodRY6DWRuyq/Qe3+NFn/xLe 9DL4KF6gOyToG5AcNu/idMzhrpB3YUU7FXYiEVdanXtBOSgh9QUZ16f3OpYmilSlbTLq O9FJfwyV4RddBzarmVluyk+5YnEGdk6ioIUhgQZq85ozq6qaxg2b3XvFgBWnghor0vV4 M/zDBFnj18vq+tgl9XM7TJYpZYu5nUP04ub2MRzPgxGekyzn3ObjYIsqpUlIT2S9GCH0 gxrw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX9AYFqfl4FpJP6PgdtriXxuSVEPAp0UWoWv9T2DAXrAFpX1we2 pF7JPK0jqMpQ+kWfL9s1Deg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqNc162MWN+U0wkiER8LQH4r6hzxzHf7ATfOKokTvNkh2vOlfVRZfmJRj2F3KFPDZaoLolJg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:b713:: with SMTP id g19mr146099745jam.77.1564876961159; Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h19sm54122745iol.65.2019.08.03.17.02.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:02:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <835znnnavb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 27 Jul 2019 11:24:25 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164511 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > - "37.9.2 Process Filter Functions" ignores the problem >> > completely. There should be a paragraph clearly stating this >> > problem. Further, it would be nice, if the filter function >> > example could be extended to correctly deal with this problem. >> >> I added a mention of the possibility of recursion. I'm not sure about >> making an example (specifically, what is the best way to deal with this >> problem?). > > I agree with Noam's decisions, and think that his patch is fine. > > Thanks. Any thoughts about make-buffered-filter? Leave it up to callers to write their own most situation-appropriate version of it? Add it as an example to the manual? Add it to Emacs?