From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9454: 24.0.50; thingatpt.el should be updated to respect field boundaries Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:47:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87pnl0zh7f.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <44787C2CD18A4D45913B6FD72C387219@us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="145436"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 9454@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 20 04:48:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBu-000biD-WB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBt-0001YE-CR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBn-0001Wg-P8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBm-0007EE-Mx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBm-0007E2-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuBm-0000IT-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9454 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 9454-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9454.156626922932403 (code B ref 9454); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 02:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9454) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 02:47:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuAv-0008QH-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuAt-0008OL-93 for 9454@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [12.144.191.101] (helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hzuAp-000229-2Z; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:47:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44787C2CD18A4D45913B6FD72C387219@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:14:57 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165396 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > I'm no expert on fields, to put it mildly. But my impression is that > thing-at-point functions should not cross field boundaries. > > I ran into this using a thing-at-point function (actually, a > thing-near-point function) in the minibuffer. Now that (forward-line 0) > takes you across the field boundary and into the prompt field, I ended > up with "Text is read-only" errors. Do you have a test case to reproduce this bug? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no