From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38306: Why the pp-buffer function is not interactive? Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnhlw26i.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87blt51ill.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="63886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38306@debbugs.gnu.org, aydar.js@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 21 18:49:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZs-000GTv-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:49:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZr-0008Mo-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:49:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZj-0008Kj-Re for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZi-0006QR-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZi-0006QH-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZi-0006Cx-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38306 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 38306-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38306.157435853323848 (code B ref 38306); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38306) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2019 17:48:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53261 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZY-0006Ca-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:48:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZW-0006CJ-GO for 38306@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:48:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iXqZK-0007ui-MA; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:48:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83wobtxpz8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:29:15 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172145 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > In my opinion it would be convenient if the pp-buffer function was an emacs >> > command. >> >> Make sense to me. I've now done this in Emacs 27. > > Should this be in NEWS? How about manuals? I didn't think the change deserved either of those things -- pp-buffer isn't documented, and adding the (interactive) spec to it didn't seem newsworthy. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no