From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:56:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnc98hzx.fsf@ebih.ebihd> References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="28978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:fZJjys6wPCz6OwgUGogkWFL+cx4= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 06:56:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa6I-0007RV-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:56:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa6H-0005Sr-I3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa5q-00052w-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa5p-0007yQ-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:48952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa5p-0007y9-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa5n-0006tc-P1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:56:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 159.69.161.202 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246983 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas wrote: > I also don't know that it's helpful to assume that the > rest of the world will take the enlightened stance. > For example, I've always assumed that many people use > Sublime Text not due to any serious feature comparison > with Emacs, but because they like its "sleek look". > I don't suggest that we should imitate proprietary > junk editor , but we should realize that these > things are not wholly unimportant. Tour de France/Giro d'Italia road race bikes look stylish AND are fast. UCI track cycling bikes look cool and futuristic AND are fast. etc etc -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal