From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42210: Add -other-window variants of project-prefix-map commands Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 23:27:35 -0700 Message-ID: <87pn96ed2g.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> References: <87blkw5cd3.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87tuymh4k9.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87k0zhv6kb.fsf@linkov.net> <87wo3hflqe.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87mu4cs0ly.fsf@linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9099"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42210@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 08 08:28:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3Yv-0002Gt-Rw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 08:28:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3Yu-0000ha-Ts for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3Yo-0000hF-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3Yo-0001Cj-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3Yo-0005ok-5C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42210 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42210-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42210.159418966522335 (code B ref 42210); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42210) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2020 06:27:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3YW-0005oB-Ts for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:41343) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jt3YU-0005nx-Rv for 42210@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C132D2; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 02:27:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 08 Jul 2020 02:27:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=YraOdR2NnxqdiRaTeR6eelOrWc y6DOibFFRBdzEUufY=; b=jFIiQC1+PAlw62lwIfY3kHFmYhxWzRr0Gox/ggOYdr 8jnXGYbPjQYKjp7wfiQjFAOC6Ql92qH/Bu/C3WzrpjZYv56tDDAbdhFFA3Mx9o4k 5mf3eFHUe1PTNbkqZ9NdoeKfkoRa45mY4g0AwlM+Ibor3SpJd1Hpdq2gT6p7KSG7 s9mL3gbiazS3LnwEA8U0pSa+mwKDY/459DAnky0b3rEfIRI6XPkbxsfwzAd3dPvK Ib2L/x5OKto/P9Vv03n22JNZaqoiZduObxE+mxBjlJpq9Aq/loEYtfs+VWcbzn5n 6EWjo3Kt4zvbrxRwjF0K2bQX5Rac8nPZmc1r2NEIT8Hw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=YraOdR 2NnxqdiRaTeR6eelOrWcy6DOibFFRBdzEUufY=; b=e/R17MBsEKcEgglgfKHVel hHoyBF0gOXdSxy5BPk/keRr2m1b/8cfNZcfDpMrfpGJwiJOd9AYYqUSvSz2tasIO 8ytMtB5Rgmwqg0SQrFYPBgf+lPfwLLSinEaI/78ZxEPnxPL8YpKHwthA1rXAFbJk DB49h/pWUFcZnGJ6UTZuMiBKE2z6PXCwj1L3yfymk7z7xpYpkBg8tM9p+OF9gD3U 5f+9qe2eVub8krTXdHcM2cypNpiSkRp92Kq6ZLXfEw2EOzmiemGhJpZ1TEp6hot5 U7+kSdMEm1Z0yANOs6P5BphwUI87c6i4ObOU8VUqxYlQXznzX8S6U82/FkMFpZgQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudeigdduuddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucgh hhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeegteffgfdtueevudevkeetjeduudegvedvveehgeeghfegieef fefhtdffvedvjeenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhi thhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <87mu4cs0ly.fsf@linkov.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182828 Archived-At: Hello Juri, On Tue 07 Jul 2020 at 01:59AM +03, Juri Linkov wrote: > Actually, keeping consistency with existing C-x 4 commands > is not a requirement. It's quite possible that existing commands > will be declared deprecated as currently is discussed on emacs-devel. Okay. >>> Would it be possible to define the 'C-x 4 p' map the same way as >>> 'C-x p p' is defined? There is a patch in https://debbugs.gnu.org/41890#127 >>> to use the default project keymap 'C-x p' in 'C-x p p'. You could try to >>> use the same keymap in 'C-x 4 p', and wrap the command call with >>> display-buffer-override-next-command. I'm not completely clear on the changes you're planning to C-x 4 -- do they interact with my proposal, such that I should wait to reroll my patch, or can I go ahead and try something equivalent to the patch in #41890 you linked to? -- Sean Whitton