From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 20:13:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn8180r5.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <875zalolt7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pn8fo3dg.fsf@bernoul.li> <837duiex1f.fsf@gnu.org> <87ime2t6h0.fsf@bernoul.li> <83sgd5aus1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6zbbydl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34100"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 20:15:31 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k4TNT-0008m7-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 20:15:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46644 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4TNS-0005oS-82 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 14:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4TLA-0005Fm-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 14:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:55368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4TL9-0005ZU-5B; Sat, 08 Aug 2020 14:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F3160C3; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id 38ecl02wdiw8; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9470A160AE; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 20:13:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83a6zbbydl.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/08 14:13:03 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253517 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > How about if we leave "Code:", but just as a heading with absolutely > no body, i.e. if we add right after it some more appropriate heading > ("Prerequisites:" or somesuch)? Would that be a good compromise? IMO that's an acceptable (but somewhat silly) compromise but what matters more is whether Stefan can agree to this and even though he replied to the rest of your message he did not reply to this question.