From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13648: 24.3.50; remove-overlays bugs Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:23:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn7e7qjl.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8738x8b1pa.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87sgcb9cg8.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10423"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stephen Berman , 13648@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 25 16:24:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrv-0002a0-Mv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:24:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32966 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZru-0000q5-MF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrm-0000mv-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrl-0003iz-Rj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrl-0005iz-OC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13648 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 13648-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13648.159836541821976 (code B ref 13648); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13648) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2020 14:23:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrN-0005iO-UW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:42382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrM-0005iA-Hi for 13648@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:23:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BdGcc0r6atO5PW18ElMz/bTnw9eOdHzwwcvOpINGvV4=; b=A7u3uhAKUuzOpeXca7REkck+I/ P/rIXORUkb0Vzbumxj7OTI1DPmmmIi6k/7YCHR5BuOS3H5qHseKsUi6QMT6u8D2lFsvV+AnGc1VXN +RCz5+yVfZ1+0EqkVDrX1lXkzoWJzoTErYQfd01w7nGEhdUGYBjglmCxnEP7/rHh/Qxo=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAZrE-0006W6-7i; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:23:30 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUjHyEhHB1VUVO6 sZ3///8XRmjUAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+QIGQ4WF8m1vfoAAAG8SURBVDjLdVPbkcQw CAOuAfA1YJMGdpL+ezsJO4n34zyzsw6yeAgQWUcjXPYTEdPunop/508L4UPHe7+6h/WbkUFWxysY w2m3TAIuatnTwhlm4DMXoI5bjuDxYR0AeSmd9j5T8o7L7arscHDldcp4AZrxpRcup9Q1ciZmOSSK cQGIxWAqjKwHEDBwtUeLNlb90kZXtarGCyg8eOuu2bK0gkx3HdL6gAJOwKWeTkI0ZKULWDXP44IY Ygwfdr52SD2yWsAYx3QvTq8+joGklEA7v3wdAwUWEAcjZ2kDpIBqYK/wF8/HoUCfDIme5wNsDIM8 9LUAdH0BqANd2xilrrJnOdpnAyhGMQar2rJij4uxK8JCIOKMsQDxOZbxAPoqpY7YuqZx97IaYGMB lFJ1k+uZdr8dekmv/q6BvjmJqHwBWApMsaquNYAbmzOkOaAPLTXIzeaw+ANIKSItLWu9GqRr19AC nEByRdS99oUiVYAFIDYvmA/xxsGOAqrehn2rlH4+D2MOYTEg+++ocibAhbX5AvNLB0zXIn5Oito4 g8G5Ywwp4FpAycWlX7Jb3gwtjcLvfux9qaX4NmznX+APxEFJima8pW0AAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3Jl YXRlADIwMjAtMDgtMjVUMTQ6MjI6MjIrMDA6MDB/zcLuAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIw LTA4LTI1VDE0OjIyOjIyKzAwOjAwDpB6UgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Various's _The Wire Tapper 53_: "Damelove - Dime" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:55:43 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186296 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The case here is (remove-overlay beg end 'foo), which will remove all >> overlays that don't have foo (as well as the ones that have foo, but >> it's set to nil)? > > I think the case you describe is indeed never useful, but it *is* > implemented, AFAIK. > > The more useful interpretation I think would be for > (remove-overlay beg end 'foo) to remove all overlays that have a non-nil > value of `foo`. But I haven't implemented it because (despite my > impression that it would be more useful) I haven't actually found any > need for it. Yeah, and perhaps that'll break something... In any case, it's probably not worth mentioning in the doc string. :/ >> (defun remove-overlays (&optional beg end name val) >> "Clear BEG and END of overlays whose property NAME has value VAL. > > As Eli points out, I wasn't very inspired when I wrote this first line. > We should at very least replace "BEG and END" with "BEG...END" or > something like that. Yup. I've added more text there. >> +BEG and END default respectively to the beginning and end of buffer. >> +Values are compared with `eq'. >> +If either NAME or VAL are specified, both should be specified." > > LGTM, Pushed to the trunk. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no