From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26911: 25.2; eshell "cd .." doesn't work correctly with TRAMP Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:46:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn785uuq.fsf@gmx.de> References: <693aa189-03fa-b963-89eb-ce19c51ba325@cs.ucla.edu> <83wo1jz32t.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgc7z220.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1rryrk0.fsf@gnu.org> <47047d69-91aa-fd0d-1510-64ba7c246970@cs.ucla.edu> <83a6yeynd1.fsf@gnu.org> <03a31052-795a-c169-c199-2b0f3ba88ec2@cs.ucla.edu> <87eenp75hi.fsf@gmx.de> <83r1rpxq4d.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuwl5krl.fsf@gmx.de> <83h7slxn92.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26911@debbugs.gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, yegortimoshenko@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 30 11:48:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJwu-0008np-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:48:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJwt-0002UG-95 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJwR-0002UA-7S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJwQ-00032n-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJwP-0007lT-TJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 26911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26911.159878083129783 (code B ref 26911); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2020 09:47:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJvb-0007kI-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:47:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53391) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kCJvX-0007jy-DS for 26911@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 05:47:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1598780815; bh=MKBzSoaKjhnHMyBxqF5QIbA43xwS23zRi6vtFEERZZ8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=AkCb9KZkKgWNJW4WCAJhPOdsstsXlkF5mSoPKCjiKHNGMxXoDVF9etV4TUo/2h82r PdvPJ9ZElTEG52y2h0MwV8gc3oANz78yZ5G3tAwljAYAFdDMAiFwxJwKOr70ZKGhDu O5iy7CGAG6N/FVV3vcgYTKG0DFkBd/pdfOaXnnd8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([212.86.60.212]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9Mtg-1kiEOJ1bcq-015KE8; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 11:46:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83h7slxn92.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 29 Aug 2020 22:31:21 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QirBX8goo7av9nQvb5p962vK/CpfENM1h9nocdwTY/xWIAlcLvq 8M9lKwqsA2+6HBfnZkvRJ0B+oeH3wQfXHTkyXlQRzxqNmibhjxMtY9MfUec91+qg7zVAhoK LZV5mgUMQubyzZ2uQKyFbxHCRDwnd/345sJIB3IT8+PEiA+RGqc6opZqLAC2RI/kL+wogIb jW6Pvn9eSoGN3uhE68B6w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:lzmxYzQw7Cs=:RsCeD57U1OWVXvFtVSJmRo Fl9VafozWLfXNk7NYfcdhCSJZXkUzTez3PqB1ogkW9KNTB1x7g7GcaoY42Q1ueorqNXftn6B6 kTl0Dc5xNdQeaQGTi68W2515Kl0jYRIeyRlmh1MKXZGduUboFqnWBZadO697+5XGoqwmfDd0h V50H5HiX4pG6vc596Mkwd+qJEgsngnu4DYSr0+5350hNVDluwxHzmCMyFOEkzp1detAN32mGD aeuTPb28ZGLKSYFoyyikVbqsowiFYoyXABfHEUFcNCelNx7rUZSpicZxxb3XQ896peZF8MIIw 1f7pW6swJki2g1uOLUB4fjDFgJVlRY4YpqjI72Z7znLxkyAtyAMb9Om1WRCmNY5TQPcicwPBO g2xecs+NkJgQmpIktKrZUA063KHyvSHujBQlIoF1SoRFVT1/knWTu8IZfe+NA1adiE6kgoCMT SBPieiEf+/EDFWT19zVgFw5wn7jw1qAHjCdlsO+gHem/SFbGakOxAyIHHbIn1rWLahQkmCH0K IjhGLOvHsaRAZRb6uEbs97O1t5mlzwo7FS/A2PfwrrOaPMNdsP5yZ7wB8E1mZQwjfciEyBvT6 Y79/5oRCeNsSSrxPDsalx+QB/EgQCe27krTV6g4T9o9gZIg9wCq7h0XUn9vtOks3LULCbjFHe TDt4AP78Cwa80bHn95vTnwHIZG4VGLCT9JT1MSisvUI03IYudVYOEu4bEfjNBfpA6G2o4G+4D B86bxlLyQ86r4TrD5qD0Tn/CoxkxDkxkZ8+dIwCi8ZrHTaE35MV4PaHJR9XgofSdKxCnnooD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186685 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi Eli, > This variant seems to work: > > REMOTE_TEMPORARY_FILE_DIRECTORY=/plink:user@host:/tmp make lisp/net/tramp-tests > > Most of the tests are "skipped", but the one you were interested in > isn't skipped, and indeed fails: > > Test tramp-test05-expand-file-name condition: > (ert-test-failed > ((should > (string-equal > (expand-file-name "/method:host:/path/.") > (if ... "/method:host:/path/" "/method:host:/path"))) > :form > (string-equal "/method:host:/path" "/method:host:/path/") > :value nil)) > FAILED 12/70 tramp-test05-expand-file-name (0.000000 sec) This is as expected, thanks. I'm a little bit undecided whether I do special-case the test for running on MS Windows, or whether I wait that it will be fixed. WDYT? > HTH Best regards, Michael.