From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: "rms@gnu.org" <rms@gnu.org>,
"jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no" <jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no>,
"mail@daniel-mendler.de" <mail@daniel-mendler.de>,
"47992@debbugs.gnu.org" <47992@debbugs.gnu.org>,
"monnier@iro.umontreal.ca" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
"larsi@gnus.org" <larsi@gnus.org>
Subject: bug#47992: [External] : bug#47992: 27; 28; Phase out use of `equal` in `add-hook`, `remove-hook`
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 05:21:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmvw2klk.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SA2PR10MB44743D274793ED9EEE263643F31B9@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 6 Jul 2021 02:37:07 +0000")
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> But I and some others also think the whole attempt
> to provide more or less `eq' testing for lambdas
> is maybe misguided
The original complaint was about `equal' testing consuming a lot of
time. That might be a valid complaint. `eq' testing doesn't create
problems unless for those not adding to hooks correctly. So moving to
`eq' and providing better help would make sense to me.
Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-24 12:11 bug#47992: 27; 28; Phase out use of `equal` in `add-hook`, `remove-hook` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-24 20:12 ` bug#47992: [External] : " Drew Adams
2021-04-24 20:23 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-24 21:20 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-24 21:34 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-24 22:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-24 22:38 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-24 23:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-24 23:38 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-25 1:16 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-25 3:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-25 4:57 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-25 13:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-25 1:16 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-25 1:23 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-25 3:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-04-25 4:57 ` Drew Adams
2021-04-25 10:33 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-25 13:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-05-02 9:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-02 10:37 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-05-03 8:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-06 14:44 ` Olivier Certner
[not found] ` <877di6udfy.fsf@web.de>
2021-07-04 1:09 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-04 2:35 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-07-04 2:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-04 4:28 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-07-04 13:36 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-04 17:08 ` bug#47992: [External] : " Drew Adams
2021-07-04 22:45 ` Michael Heerdegen
2021-07-05 12:39 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-06 1:48 ` Richard Stallman
2021-07-06 2:37 ` bug#47992: [External] : " Drew Adams
2021-07-06 3:21 ` Michael Heerdegen [this message]
2021-07-07 23:57 ` Richard Stallman
2021-07-06 9:46 ` Arthur Miller
2021-07-07 23:57 ` Richard Stallman
2021-07-08 2:11 ` Arthur Miller
2021-07-04 23:15 ` Michael Heerdegen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmvw2klk.fsf@web.de \
--to=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
--cc=47992@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=mail@daniel-mendler.de \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.