From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuchen Pei Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Alternatives for reliable build environments for emacs? Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 17:53:13 +1100 Message-ID: <87pmrhenmu.fsf@ypei.me> References: <87bl39cnr4.fsf@tanaka.verona.se> <83zgqts28b.fsf@gnu.org> <871r45ciyp.fsf@tanaka.verona.se> <87ilxghdvw.fsf@ypei.me> <834k90s6gq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.2 Cc: joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 03 07:54:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1miA9p-0007Q9-KI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 07:54:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miA9n-0000Vj-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miA9F-0008Gx-8U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:54541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miA9C-0003h8-1V; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5489B5C010D; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:53:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Nov 2021 02:53:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ypei.me; h= references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=rch2MVkqYgU1WC7sHsNYnYv3bE PozNS3f9U7QwXLDiQ=; b=d4q2LeeZ11mgx98qA6OwGAhn4+u1iEkKGqujbYwYH8 CVL95U66bhxitcfa35RhIsXKRbaZ3s8xllf9sy24p1vO6QYrCVja+b/9kaj51uss vheUROOiCA2gkJ9cj0RwmaDIiTNkirmBJK8QECmlFs03pb8tI7Kz7ZfrIPTcNkoV syXpVQpsTra8/Z9LgEmvlUsc5smHbHeX8VWyKbIiKZUy6jGVC9C6WuTZ2v0bTOjT 9mJnMkkg6JwJ8HzlPAqmPPEwj70LzxiC9X5PMtbYPfmrpRA5ORp+C+NH10D4i47I eZ0U/jLyLKQi79AMEUSNd1WmViZniwYqM+/KibIVp/DA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=rch2MV kqYgU1WC7sHsNYnYv3bEPozNS3f9U7QwXLDiQ=; b=b4g4GWCB7YFQV9Mk4gFaMt qC9vTsxGSxwmLtlbwEE4JinPsZzoUzTHYWVY3yA2o6DFnGIbShaMNfD2U8RhoSuo Nlqa7KJ8la58GRZYpjE5U1Abg9mompaMMAobSEa2jftRWPCwPNeor6g4EMrlN//6 xel3mqoE8Ruejq7gHM/YT+HNeOsgmb/NLLnUkx0cHIfbX83x7vyhXa/C9AeeCtoj ZfpAXYslPnH9b8KRfUHWUFtr1JgkEQsUSTaSeFlVjIWz5a91wHzZUSyOo1YcbmBV bJZV7kqrDX4TeYczub0CqMZAmNHNfM4/XZYZhImswCbCTvjGVM9czru5zHV41Ltg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrtddugdelkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpehffgfhvffujgffkfggtgesghdtreertdertdenucfhrhhomhepjghutghhvghn ucfrvghiuceohhhiseihphgvihdrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejiedtleefhf ffheelheevkeffheeffeefteffgfevhedviefhhedvveeugfekhfenucffohhmrghinhep ghhnuhdrohhrghdphihpvghirdhmvgenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehhiheshihpvghirdhmvg X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 02:53:17 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <834k90s6gq.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=hi@ypei.me; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278561 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Yuchen Pei >> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:29:39 +1100 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> I was trying to build emacs on a debian + guix system today. >> The >> debian is bare minimum, and guix is used as the main package >> manager. >> >> Without `guix shell`, I got stuck at problem with gnutls: >> >> > configure: error: The following required libraries were not >> > found: >> > gnutls >> > Maybe some development libraries/packages are missing? >> >> The version of gnutls installed by guix in the system is >> 3.6.15. > > It tells you to make sure you have all the development packages > installed, and I think it's the accurate advice. People build > Emacs > with that version of GnuTLS without any problems. I managed to resolve this by installing gnutls-dane. > >> With `guix shell --development emacs`, gnutls wasn't a problem, >> but I got stuck at segfault at bootstrap-emacs.pdmp: >> >> > make[1]: *** [Makefile:858: bootstrap-emacs.pdmp] >> > Segmentation >> > fault >> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/foo/source/emacs/src' >> > make: *** [Makefile:450: src] Error 2 > > If you want help in solving this problem, please submit a bug > report > with all the details, including at least the configure command > and the > full log of the build from the configure step till the segfault. > config.log would also help. This was resolved as in . > > Thanks. -- Best, Yuchen PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040 4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIEEARYIACkWIQRH+dBQHhGIeZBASUEhJn6T74bf0AUCYYIx2QscaGlAeXBlaS5t ZQAKCRAhJn6T74bf0GHLAPwOHZZg63E5xBBSpeWY2e6wiVDTELos7xka/LYCJzXB 9QEA7X7KWnoJm1aU13wFWBeoNgTpOsLObN8gnNTU3scLDgc= =zA0i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--