From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36566: 27.0.50; debug is sometimes horribly slow Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 13:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmkgl52s.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r26yvb4r.fsf@web.de> <871ryy2l1t.fsf@gmail.com> <87r26xjyon.fsf@web.de> <877e8llbzo.fsf@runbox.com> <8736ilaepu.fsf@runbox.com> <87h871u24i.fsf@gmail.com> <874l2vcrtn.fsf@runbox.com> <874l2eosa7.fsf@gmail.com> <87mufh8jj2.fsf@runbox.com> <87v9tza6gg.fsf@gmail.com> <875zlvj453.fsf@runbox.com> <87bkwp2pjr.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6c72v1t.fsf@runbox.com> <87k0bb16jc.fsf@web.de> <874k2ed828.fsf@gnus.org> <875ym931t9.fsf@runbox.com> <87mtfl1kxt.fsf@gnus.org> <87h75s3gx8.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com>, 36566@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 14 13:42:44 2022 Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1npqAW-000AcN-6M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 13:42:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1npqAU-0003Nu-PK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npq41-0001H2-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:36:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npq41-0006BM-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npq41-0003YO-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 11:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36566.B36566.165252815213640@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 36566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36566.165252815213640 (code B ref 36566); Sat, 14 May 2022 11:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2022 11:35:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1npq3s-0003Xw-DV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <larsi@gnus.org>) id 1npq3q-0003Xe-N3 for 36566@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2022 07:35:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=z461BGuQckYxdh6NIu8+Nym8gL2rKt8v4ARxH5aVFG4=; b=fnBxPXDiGLEc6F8c+iHtPxyNg+ LKE72oIJx/5a5MEFzYu9mE4K3LEAyGcxAL3tmScqJ3CbC3AtKKTmsro2m3RimM8huZuxbymw5MFwi 7otMowzAcal6jU92x7plrwhbxmXH7y3g75g7YB7DhIxZ4xH2B1/N8cGKSvS2Lt0ql02I=; Original-Received: from 77.18.168.214.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.168.214] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <larsi@gnus.org>) id 1npq3g-0003Sf-G9; Sat, 14 May 2022 13:35:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h75s3gx8.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sat, 14 May 2022 05:57:07 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs> List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:232230 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/232230> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes: > Changing `edebug-print-level' helps... Maybe the default is too > large? Changing it to 20 doesn't seem to have much effect, but at 10, things are pretty speedy. The problem then is that the output is all dots: Result: ((((((((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...)))) ((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))))) (((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...)))) ((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...)))))) ((((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...)))) ((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))))) (((((... ...) (... ...)) ((... ...) (... ...))) (((... It goes on like that for 6K. I suspect that we need a better algorithm for identifying and dealing with tree structures. That is, if we determine that we're not really printing a list, but a tree (that shouldn't be too difficult, statistically), then edebug could flip a printing switch and do this... differently. (Hand-wavey details left as an exercise for the reader.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no