From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36566: 27.0.50; debug is sometimes horribly slow Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 18:25:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87pmkehifs.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r26yvb4r.fsf@web.de> <874l2eosa7.fsf@gmail.com> <87mufh8jj2.fsf@runbox.com> <87v9tza6gg.fsf@gmail.com> <875zlvj453.fsf@runbox.com> <87bkwp2pjr.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6c72v1t.fsf@runbox.com> <87k0bb16jc.fsf@web.de> <874k2ed828.fsf@gnus.org> <875ym931t9.fsf@runbox.com> <87mtfl1kxt.fsf@gnus.org> <87h75s3gx8.fsf@web.de> <87pmkgl52s.fsf@gnus.org> <87lev4jeyq.fsf@gnus.org> <87czggjdeo.fsf@gnus.org> <878rr4jbr3.fsf@gnus.org> <87r14vhtju.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , Gemini Lasswell , 36566@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 15 18:26:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH4L-0000R3-Lt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 18:26:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH4K-0003fI-Ou for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH4E-0003co-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH4D-0006cw-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH4D-0003Hi-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 16:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 36566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36566.165263192312577 (code B ref 36566); Sun, 15 May 2022 16:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2022 16:25:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH3b-0003Gm-Lu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:25:23 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH3a-0003GZ-Cw for 36566@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:25:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MYgveeBMgnnYc6+ESTDRCj9K0RLM0X/IGOJhmTDzziI=; b=BiXCIEYfYXhW5Au2+0vUcZLhZz fEO3qjmqNa4ddbcQ8M4nJrX1gBn61vGIgssRdb1UHsAgh1bgsQNsG09UwJtdE4J+0oa3LM3ulcr5w PKZ8VRluTyZ/SmHc4fXtAr2JmDFczLQ7S9gAaAlIji2Y+vBhoWd0hJ+djb7HMF9lo0jo=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqH3P-0002Fx-Ty; Sun, 15 May 2022 18:25:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 15 May 2022 12:13:19 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:232333 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But this reminds me -- why do we have `cl-print' anyway? > > Because we want to let packages use `cl-defmethod` to provide their own > output syntax for their objects. > >> Shouldn't the C version handle printing things nicely? > > The C code doesn't really know about cl-defstructs (or advice objects). Wouldn't it make sense to teach the C `prin1' about those (and also call out to the Lisp level for the objects that have a specialised print syntax)? We've got something vaguely similar with `print-unreadable-function', for instance. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no