From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62194: 30.0.50; Two Eglot-over-Tramp tests are failing on master, passing on emacs-29 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:57:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87pm98iw1e.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87wn3jue1q.fsf@gmail.com> <87edpqjqsv.fsf@gmx.de> <874jqmjl0s.fsf@gmx.de> <875yb1pxai.fsf@miha-pc> <87ttykj45i.fsf@gmx.de> <878rfw51mh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12508"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 62194@debbugs.gnu.org, miha@kamnitnik.top To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 16 15:58:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp3a-0002uG-LV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:58:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp3M-0005No-DB; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp3K-0005Nf-RO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp3K-0002zP-JD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp3K-0002PE-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62194 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62194-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62194.16789786579215 (code B ref 62194); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62194) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2023 14:57:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42735 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp2v-0002OY-48 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:39233) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pcp2k-0002OC-MM for 62194@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:57:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1678978640; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=daRxt2thBrh2JeCuXggB0Ug+hHWYJpNDkvnL2fTnBeU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=N1Hn8hseLuPqdUkRSRgVxWRQUcRc/DrnyaiOHJnrgM7hJjNHdbeqfD/bpvbbNktVy Q82VvU/mAOeMGH9toDUrCXW+uaEYXeugpV3LuXHqVhFtANRKlPA6rSHjVRpQMYzXHg 4eFQRXTcbe/xWZ9jcIojxtr8VJ10tF8uyBTvxxNax3TlEmDLBylox0q8+F+r9gfkip SKsXNETnneBFJXqwfYjcGlGpIx2+X3lU4f50UBxGMCljawWXUmGeBX6RYXJtndLTWS e626wJBI8tSIzRPkGWs8y8fhvhg7CoRBP85xIV974JZYyo5N5vxgUnvkHDAkUE1pT+ I8c6Z7qVvsAFA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.19]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MzhnH-1qPAX31Fdh-00vh4I; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 15:57:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878rfw51mh.fsf@gmail.com> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:20:22 +0000") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Y1zbm2Mtm0sngNxAy1GKvUjMFB0TM7noyhOoqcSeQuvxgVTfi2+ 4VTMXO7g6BNmrdplyUxe8/TZdLslKoThWLtJtPlvO5ktqxK34uSUjONQ/y/RVinlDESzZAe ZSvSmbc4MMj+1pRoJ4PSlnyg8FYkboGugMJ5wluhXfZuJgw5OPZZATzQiNB3fUNSlrh5oWJ 9zp4hNInWl7EQSz+02QZQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:i3MEvuLwrPM=;Gyfp3tMOri2FP7u44wYSyltZZoW t821UdFAUYI01VIdyN7lVMRTcdUPIXBLIKQ/Tjv1WjlqaCzh39YfpoahlT05mTgZbcZbnWZDm KrDMcD5PcAtTypRZLR7LpewQIqIs/Mkoqx+AmLWczlNRAIcmElS2S1Mqb1lVd/7o+HQCssTGU 4rUqKdbVkaedUUbKo889iNxWzWJQ65P97t5PDdebcNseixVcf+VcG+KioEgLljaLe/yRnuBRm 59W0ThjvCVgxV3zYtaxVI9mjNRYQ8auPR2PYDwSiliM+looSyfV/gZw5z0zqx+wxSYlRU1eEH jQJ/MNq+CugNXEBjxykRV8o8XGx2CHcUaLInr3QBglH+4/fBco/kRU2IUK5+15sPjbArfGyvn 7WE9jHxIheK7/4xZES54vbHhOmeafepZ0LgB23JoGjytbUK+2fW5rDlGXN17D16rN4UnuVaoS 2Fy8rzWerflQwci0khXiNi0YgURpith4Q7H5vjnOUQX775ShhmJ9ziWgvYZx4YvC0K+F2BufQ Pzx1SLnLjWmSwTvaWNrZm6jn6yrURdgRos0BR6vGfnkvfcN2gnZ3zFECZ5VNVjZVPqAPSmcmB 5h08DLT0fuzoJmTHxIJ2fWfBPe4YzxqkTlL5SD5NxsA6CKw52CvYrlV9GJxZxnZ/JDoD3yfMr 8UaXakZn5+oUcjbRjlEmRB9XqmOou9s44KUpd2dKXq6/JsdjpKiIxUK+YzS9eDh9oTBOey2Ci cIzTreFyffMFYBppgsZcsf+JFMuCPKBhrWDjpK2Fj2FWupVpVpRw6vkEt7kWngzflGwHDT3T X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:258020 Archived-At: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: Hi Jo=C3=A3o, > Michael, now you've brought back the Eglot/Tramp hang of bug#61350! > > Really Michael, please consider reverting 0330cff65ae (your latest) and > 54ef338ba36 (from two days ago), and going back to the simpler version > that you originally proposed, with just the 'while' added there. Honestly, I'm lost with all the patches back forth and back. Could you pls show me the change you propose, based on the current master state? I don't believe we need to revert the timeout change I have applied, because in fact any tramp-accept-process-output shall use a timeout of 0; otherwise it could block. > It fixes all this mess. _Then_ we can go get to thinking about the > "simple and robust" implementation. Yes. Although I have no clue yet what shall be done. > Jo=C3=A3o Best regards, Michael.