From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status of shell-pcomplete integration? Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:04:10 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87of83qbjp.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> References: <87u1hxstta.fsf@orebokech.com> <843cph3fm8.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <877ket8ifr.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <84ptsj5z0f.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <873cpf2xs1.fsf@orebokech.com> <84u1hvt7y2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> <87r8czqdu6.fsf@alice.dynodns.net> <200212031628.gB3GSuS07618@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038935261 6939 80.91.224.249 (3 Dec 2002 17:07:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 17:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JGWK-0001nm-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 18:07:40 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18JGfv-0003yl-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 18:17:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18JGVk-0004mP-00; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18JGT6-00039t-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18JGT0-0002uW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:04:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gci-net.com ([216.183.68.100] helo=gci-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18JGT0-0002u9-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:04:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [216.183.69.143] (HELO aris) by gci-net.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 4220584 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:03:29 -0700 Original-Received: from johnw by aris with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18JGSw-0007OB-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2002 10:04:10 -0700 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Public-Key: http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF40524D0 X-Home-Page: http://www.gci-net.com/users/j/johnw/ In-Reply-To: <200212031628.gB3GSuS07618@rum.cs.yale.edu> ("Stefan Monnier"'s message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2002 11:28:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9839 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9839 >>>>> On Tue Dec 3, Stefan writes: > I think the priority is to switch over to pcomplete. To maximize > the chances of such a switch being accepted, we should strive to > preserve the current behavior as much as possible. The behavior > can later on be changed, but at first we should just concentrate on > getting pcomplete to behave "like the current code". As long as it gets changed before 21.3 goes out? I tell you, no one will know its there, and nobody will get the benefit of using it. John