From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bad Protocol request 77 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:19:12 -0400 Message-ID: <87oe9ma71z.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87fyv1d84x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <8DCDF4A8-1124-4F34-8C44-68BD7A647A31@swipnet.se> <0169E5CE-9890-4858-A170-7D3A0EFCBF7C@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120231087 23020 80.91.229.2 (1 Jul 2005 15:18:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 15:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 17:18:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoNH6-0001Rn-3J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:17:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoNPY-0001qb-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoNOL-0001X0-OQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoNOH-0001TK-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:25:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoNOD-0001Qf-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.54] (helo=tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoNNX-00058N-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:24:31 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.27.2]) by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050701151913.PFFL26102.tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:19:13 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEB4ED73E0; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:19:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: jhd In-Reply-To: <0169E5CE-9890-4858-A170-7D3A0EFCBF7C@swipnet.se> (jhd's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2005 12:05:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40037 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40037 > As you had a recipe for reproducing this, it is probably the =C5=93 char= acter > that is either miscoded in the string argument (the penultimate argument, > an XChar2b *) or it is missing in the font used for bold. If you can pr= int > the values in the XChar2b* (the last argument to XDrawImageString16 > specifies the length in characters, i.e. bytes/2) and use xfd to inspect > the font used, you should be able to tell if all characters in the XChar= 2b* > are present in the font. It's indeed missing from the font, Stefan