From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: asynchronous process management on WinWP; buffering problem? Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:21:04 +0900 Message-ID: <87odz2xte7.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <10m877fael0h3.1kg7y6ljn4qmb$.dlg@40tude.net> <443fdf5c$1@kcnews01> <877j5r3ogd.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <444110BE.3050009@student.lu.se> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1145170522 13590 80.91.229.2 (16 Apr 2006 06:55:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 16 08:55:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1AC-0002RQ-2K for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 08:55:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV1AB-0000bU-LD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FUv0q-0006Jc-Kw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FUv0p-0006J6-98 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FUv0o-0006Iw-SF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.216.5.72] (helo=smtp02.dentaku.gol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FUv17-0002sl-5x; Sat, 15 Apr 2006 20:21:29 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-101-205.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.101.205] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1FUv0k-0004CL-Tr; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:21:07 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 54B982F49; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:21:06 +0900 (JST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:50:09 +0200") Original-Lines: 12 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 02:54:37 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:34394 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > Thanks for the good explanation. Indeed it looks difficult to fix this > on the w32 platform. In my opinion w32 does not look very much POSIX > conformant here. Or the POSIX specs are just too weak. I don't know if ptys are actually part of POSIX, but ... has w32 every _claimed_ to be "POSIX conformant" (I mean, other than in the "deceive the government" sense)? -Miles -- Run away! Run away!