From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: common-lisp-indent'ation of def*
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:14 -0400
Message-ID: <87odrybyhl.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <f7ccd24b0610230424g6449611by9dcb16522fb025c0@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1Gcn68-0006eg-5k@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161895364 31547 80.91.229.2 (26 Oct 2006 20:42:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 26 22:42:41 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdC3f-0007jE-RX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:42:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdC3f-0007rv-DZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:35 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdC34-0007ge-To
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:41:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GdC30-0007f5-VF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:41:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdC30-0007et-QW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:41:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1GdC2z-0007CI-69; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:41:53 -0400
Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 728014E42D; Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:42:14 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <E1Gcn68-0006eg-5k@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message
	of "Wed\, 25 Oct 2006 14\:03\:28 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61207
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/61207>

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     So, is this a bug in `lisp-indent-line' (and the docstring of
>     `calculate-lisp-indent'), and '((8 241) 241) should be treated as
>     valid? Or, OTOH, it is a bug in `common-lisp-indent-function' and
>     friends?
>
> Since the callers of `lisp-indent-line' fail when it returns such a
> value, I conclude they agree with its documentation.  So I conclude
> that the bug is in `common-lisp-indent-function' and its subroutines.

I concur.  I've checked in a fix.