From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window' Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:16:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87odds1end.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878x4wetef.fsf@jurta.org> <87ve80ph17.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k5og2xea.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195352233 4461 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2007 02:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 03:17:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItZin-0002pR-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 03:17:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItZiZ-0005BL-DD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItZiV-000588-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItZiT-000545-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItZiT-00053n-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItZiT-0005my-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so397484fkr for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:16:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=ZEUm9zVv16LdqzYO/21YxC2KKrvVd6SfHaAJlHcSyJA=; b=X1Zw5WwKsuTvSBTE/nLLo6Kfkr4dEoFEgi5xgeJ2KudSDuohPH4xqt+7xV++b7NZ3zXWIt9YLanJwQIUPCIUWtrty794bOCCx3mdWMAvGtDghmc+rlrUydEDllFTJW2p0MV+XP+7iBmrBg52O5FQCV0tpqjOVyPvuM4bFwGRCds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=jeSAbSKiWf6r+DoQ82WUk4ZHK9xlegoLjCdGsmB2ioTVcsko3TyUVtX0FsakOyMlnV5Rm+Gi5OYlMgW5I3HXczsMN/8fyLxwaHSyFcBePWceV5UgKFJHQg0YwglBa6h0Ez8RODu6xdWSWzvq4ApGZSawTTsEt6pj+6lfBr62vqE= Original-Received: by 10.86.65.11 with SMTP id n11mr3464022fga.1195352216619; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:16:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [89.240.40.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k7sm5076746nfh.2007.11.17.18.16.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:16:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B05DC1575BA; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:16:54 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87k5og2xea.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:16:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83505 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >> Anyway, 0.4 now implements what you proposed. > > Thank you, it now works as I expected. Pleased to hear this. > When others will propose different schemes, you could add more > options, and later could take a poll what scheme to use as default. All right. Thanks again for the very clear suggestion. -- Bastien