From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face-remapping-alist client code Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:50:36 +0900 Message-ID: <87od6jzy9v.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <611w3gcesf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <005201c8c4bb$aec2f580$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87tzgbzyjq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212418258 24017 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2008 14:50:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 16:51:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3BNr-0002Kj-0e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:51:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3BN4-0007Pu-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:50:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3BMz-0007Pj-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:50:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3BMy-0007P8-95 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47933 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3BMy-0007P5-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]:41335) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3BMu-0005Qf-5E; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.231.108.5.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.108.5] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1K3BMr-0008JX-K4; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:50:37 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E20EE2F3E; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:50:36 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87tzgbzyjq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:44:41 +0900") Original-Lines: 16 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98233 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > The current code operates _per buffer_ (the previous code grew or shrunk > the entire frame). I think per-buffer operation is far more useful > (e.g., I currently have my Gnus article buffer resized up one step which > is kind of pleasant; for viewing big files, resizing down a step or two > is quite nice). Another point is that the per-buffer mechanism is much faster (even on a slow machine) -- frame-resize is _slow_ as well as being flaky. You can happily use auto-repeat... :-) -Miles -- Kilt, n. A costume sometimes worn by Scotchmen [sic] in America and Americans in Scotland.