From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1399: 23.0.60; Some Unicode glyphs incorrectly mapped to CJK Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:26:05 -0500 Message-ID: <87oczyc5ky.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1399@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228013431 16392 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2008 02:50:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1399@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 30 03:51:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6cPF-00071K-TF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 03:51:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33465 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cO5-0006H7-Qk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cO1-0006FL-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cNz-0006AX-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40553 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6cNz-0006AC-CR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:46063) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6cNy-0002jo-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAU2oCLT020818; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:50:12 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mAU2Z3Io016448; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:35:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:35:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1399 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1399-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1399.122801196815051 (code B ref 1399); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1399) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Nov 2008 02:26:08 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAU2Q51G015043 for <1399@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:26:06 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA53057E09E; Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:26:05 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:50:16 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22782 Archived-At: Hi Handa-san, Could you take a look at this bug report? Ian Eure wrote: > It seems that some Unicode glyphs are incorrectly categorized. > > For example, U+201C, U+201D, U+2018, U+2019 (LEFT/RIGHT SINGLE/DOUBLE > QUOTATION MARK) are all mapped into the CHK category. This results in > the use of the STHeiti font for those characters, which are a > different width than the normal font I've chosen. > > I think it's incorrect for them to be categorized as CJK, since they > are widely used in latin scripts.