bug#4231: Need more reproduction information.

bug#4231: Need more reproduction information.

[Karl Fogel]

Thanks.  I think I'll need a concrete reproduction recipe here -- that
is, something with an actual remote filename in it.  I haven't used
remote files for 10 years or more (since the early days of ange-ftp),
and have no idea of what the syntax or setup is like now.  Having the
full reproduction recipe will save me a lot of time.

bug#4231: Need more reproduction information.

[Drew Adams]

> Thanks.  I think I'll need a concrete reproduction recipe here -- that
> is, something with an actual remote filename in it.  I haven't used
> remote files for 10 years or more (since the early days of ange-ftp),
> and have no idea of what the syntax or setup is like now.  Having the
> full reproduction recipe will save me a lot of time.

I think maybe I was mistaken about this. In any case, I'm sorry, but I don't
have the time now to follow up on it. Please close the bug.

FWIW, my recollection is that `C-x r l' was trying to determine if each
bookmark's file was accessible, but I now don't see that in the code, so I think
I was mistaken. My point was that `C-x r l' should just display the bookmark,
without ensure that it is still valid - but I think now that that's what it does
do. So please close this - sorry for the noise.