From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:19:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87oclei0tv.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <87637qhjqu.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx6urat1.fsf@telefonica.net> <871viepn48.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87skaupkr9.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ws06o0mx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4w6pe9s.fsf@telefonica.net> <87vdfnofh3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878wcjlkjr.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eimanny3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262341563 2918 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 10:26:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 10:26:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 11:25:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQehf-0003qX-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:25:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQehf-0005zj-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQegy-0005vQ-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:25:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQegs-0005u7-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38362 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQegs-0005u0-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57390) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQegs-0007yC-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:25:06 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NQegp-0003ct-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net ([88.24.214.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:25:03 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 11:25:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.red-88-24-214.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DkrpPyI1RV/BWn82WRnIVVmZJ1s= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119196 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > Óscar Fuentes writes: > > > Maybe you are not aware that VC went through a complete rewrite to > > support this on the last year or two. > > What I am or am not aware of is irrelevant. What matters is that it > would be a change for Handa-san. A change that nobody has yet advised > him to make! It is advertised on BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs > > Read again. I'm not saying that there's zero problem. > > OK. You made a comment about "perfectly OK", which I read as > including "perfectly safe." Sorry. You are taking that expression out of context. > > Please do not misrepresent my position. One thing is saying that a few > > more cases of multiple commits is not a problem after years of doing it, > > other thing is saying that it is fine to keep doing it. > > You're missing the point that until now people didn't use "cvs log" in > preference to "grep ChangeLog", etc, though. Now they are going to > want to. I hope so. -- Óscar