From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Difference between org-footnote.el and footnote.el Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87ocan7sv7.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87tykgxqbb.fsf@fastmail.fm> <878w1s7zw8.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871v7k7ydt.fsf_-_@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4CC00391.6050608@easy-emacs.de> <87wrpb7unc.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287656239 21176 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 10:17:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Carsten Dominik , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Emacs developers To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 12:17:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8sCx-0004WF-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8sCx-0003Jp-7R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:17:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35228 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8sCl-0003FR-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8sCk-0005jh-Ux for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:20285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8sCk-0005jc-PD; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8463F78012F2; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01835-03; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:00 +0200 (CEST) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender noch tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (tsdh.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.67.142]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA9778012EF; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:17:00 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87wrpb7unc.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:38:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-koblenz.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131932 gmane.emacs.orgmode:32248 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: >> common footnote.el was never able to detect if a file opened has >> already footnote inside. Didn't check that for some month now... > > Yes, I've just tried that. Create a file with footnotes, save it, kill > the buffer, find it again, add another footnote, and it starts numbering > from [1] again. Looks like a bug to me. I'll report it... Done as bug#7258. Bye, Tassilo