From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.2.94 pretest Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87oc627ey3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87aahva31q.fsf@gmail.com> <87y6567ihx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <19813.18711.4000.254620@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298487726 28488 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2011 19:02:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 23 20:02:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsJyL-0005ko-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:02:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsJyK-0007lX-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43965 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PsJyF-0007lG-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsJyE-0000uq-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]:60850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PsJyE-0000ug-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014213.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1NJ1ep1014622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91F84160683; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:01:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <19813.18711.4000.254620@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (Uday S. Reddy's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:51:19 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136401 Archived-At: Uday S Reddy writes: > Chong Yidong writes: > >> Did you have any such problems with 23.2.93? > > No, I had an occasional crash, but nothing like this. There are only about six changes between .93 and .94 that are likely to create crashed where none previously existed. If the crashes are frequent enough, I suggest reverting each of these to see what makes a difference. Are you using the binaries, or building Emacs from source? If the latter, try individually reverting each of these in turn: 100470 100466 100459 100458 100444 100441 I can mail you the patches if you don't have access to bzr. Running Emacs in gdb and getting the backtrace, as Eli suggested, would also be helpful.